2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02871.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular karyotyping and aneuploidy detection in Arabidopsis thaliana using quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction

Abstract: SummaryCertain cellular processes are sensitive to changes in gene dosage. Aneuploidy is deleterious because of an imbalance of gene dosage on a chromosomal scale. Identification, classification and characterization of aneuploidy are therefore important for molecular, population and medical genetics and for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying dosage sensitivity. Notwithstanding recent progress in genomic technologies, limited means are available for detecting and classifying changes in chromoso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
73
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Aneuploidy is very common in polyploids (Ramsey and Schemske, 1998), including in A. thaliana (Henry et al, 2006), and the types and frequency of aneuploidy in a population can be diagnostic of meiotic irregularity and pairing preferences. Different types of irregularities were observed in our populations, such as whole chromosome aneuploidy (Figure 2, top), segmental aneuploidy (Figure 2, second plot), as well as more complex dosage configurations in which select portions of the genomes were present in more than one extra copy or exhibited both increased and decreased copy number within a single chromosome (Figure 2, bottom plot, black arrow).…”
Section: Chromosome Dosage Analysis Of Synthetic Arabidopsis Allopolymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aneuploidy is very common in polyploids (Ramsey and Schemske, 1998), including in A. thaliana (Henry et al, 2006), and the types and frequency of aneuploidy in a population can be diagnostic of meiotic irregularity and pairing preferences. Different types of irregularities were observed in our populations, such as whole chromosome aneuploidy (Figure 2, top), segmental aneuploidy (Figure 2, second plot), as well as more complex dosage configurations in which select portions of the genomes were present in more than one extra copy or exhibited both increased and decreased copy number within a single chromosome (Figure 2, bottom plot, black arrow).…”
Section: Chromosome Dosage Analysis Of Synthetic Arabidopsis Allopolymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize meiotic stability, FISH of developing microspores was performed on each F2 individual, as well as the parental genotypes, as described previously (Henry et al, 2006). Briefly, fluorescent probes specific to the A. thaliana and A. arenosa centromeric repeats were used to distinguish between the two types of chromosomes, allowing us to record chromosome numbers in developing microspores at different stages of meiosis, as well as observations consistent with meiosis instability, such as chromosomal bridges or laggards (Figure 4).…”
Section: Meiotic Regularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aneuploidy is very frequent in plant polyploid populations (Khush, 1973;Ramsey and Schemske, 2002;Henry et al, 2006). This frequency is even higher in areas where diploid and tetraploid populations coexist and can intercross to produce triploid individuals (Ramsey and Schemske, 1998;Henry et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microspores obtained from developing flower buds were harvested and used for chromosome counts by FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) as described in Henry et al (2006). Briefly, FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate)-labeled A. thaliana centromeric DNA probes (Comai et al, 2003) were hybridized to slides prepared as follows: The slides were first incubated in 100 mg ml À1 ribonuclease A (cat.…”
Section: Chromosome Counts In Developing Microsporesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation