2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular mapping of QTLs for gluten strength as measured by sedimentation volume and mixograph in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp durum)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
49
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
14
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For SV the heritability ranged from 94.2% to 97.1%. These results were in agreement with those reported by Clarke et al (2000) and were higher than those reported by Huang et al (2006) and Patil et al (2009). The genotype-environment interaction was highly significant for GPC and SV, showing that these traits require selection in multiple environments.…”
Section: Phenotypic Datasupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For SV the heritability ranged from 94.2% to 97.1%. These results were in agreement with those reported by Clarke et al (2000) and were higher than those reported by Huang et al (2006) and Patil et al (2009). The genotype-environment interaction was highly significant for GPC and SV, showing that these traits require selection in multiple environments.…”
Section: Phenotypic Datasupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The most important QTLs for SV found in this work are in agreement with those cited by other authors on chromosome arms 1BL, 6AL, 6BL and 7AS (Elouafi et al 2000;Kerfal et al 2010;Patil et al 2009;McCartney et al 2006;Zhang et al 2008). The position of the QSv.cerz-1BL QTL located on chromosome 1BL coincided with the protein marker Glu-B1 on the map.…”
Section: Sds Sedimentation Volumesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For each trait, phenotypic data for the individual environments were analysed separately and LV, SV and GPC were analysed together with the MDRTs to compare the QTLs for both. The positions and effects of QTLs were detected by Composite interval mapping (CIM) and the tests of pleiotropy versus close linkage was performed by Multi-trait CIM (Mt-CIM) (Jiang and Zeng, 1995), both implemented in QTL Cartographer v. 2.5 (Wang et al, 2007) with parameters described by Patil et al (2009). QTLs were declared at LOD !3.0 and those in identical, overlapping or adjacent marker intervals in a linkage group were treated as the same.…”
Section: Qtl Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%