2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(200002)21:3<239::aid-jcc7>3.0.co;2-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular mechanics-based measures of steric effects: Customized code to compute Ligand repulsive energies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,17,27,28 Subsequently, Brown and others have computed ligand repulsive energies with a variety of different ligands in a series of different prototypical environments using two different force fields (MMP2 and UFF). 2,18,22,24,25,29,30 In general, ligand repulsive energies show the same trend irrespective of either fragment or force field used for their computation. 18,22,24,25,29 In this paper, we apply the ligand repulsive energy methodology to the computation of the steric interaction between prochiral R-olefins, CH 2 dCHR (R ) Me, n-Pr, CH 2 Ph (Bn), Ph, i-Pr, t-Bu, and SiMe 3 ), 14 and the chiral organometallic fragments, [CpRe(NO)(L)] + and [Cp*Re-(NO)(L)] + (L ) PPh 3 , PMe 3 ; Cp* ) η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15,17,27,28 Subsequently, Brown and others have computed ligand repulsive energies with a variety of different ligands in a series of different prototypical environments using two different force fields (MMP2 and UFF). 2,18,22,24,25,29,30 In general, ligand repulsive energies show the same trend irrespective of either fragment or force field used for their computation. 18,22,24,25,29 In this paper, we apply the ligand repulsive energy methodology to the computation of the steric interaction between prochiral R-olefins, CH 2 dCHR (R ) Me, n-Pr, CH 2 Ph (Bn), Ph, i-Pr, t-Bu, and SiMe 3 ), 14 and the chiral organometallic fragments, [CpRe(NO)(L)] + and [Cp*Re-(NO)(L)] + (L ) PPh 3 , PMe 3 ; Cp* ) η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…2,18,22,24,25,29,30 In general, ligand repulsive energies show the same trend irrespective of either fragment or force field used for their computation. 18,22,24,25,29 In this paper, we apply the ligand repulsive energy methodology to the computation of the steric interaction between prochiral R-olefins, CH 2 dCHR (R ) Me, n-Pr, CH 2 Ph (Bn), Ph, i-Pr, t-Bu, and SiMe 3 ), 14 and the chiral organometallic fragments, [CpRe(NO)(L)] + and [Cp*Re-(NO)(L)] + (L ) PPh 3 , PMe 3 ; Cp* ) η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ). Ligand repulsive energies computed with the Cr(CO) 5 fragment are given the label E R , and other ligand repulsive energies are called E R Force field (fragment).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The ligand repulsive energy (E R ) method can answer this question. [60] This methodology relies on quantifying the van der Waals repulsive energy variation as a function of the ligand-metal/complex distance (eq 1). In this equation E vdW is the pure repulsive form of the vdW potential and r e is the bond length between the metal and the ligating atom on a ligand (the negative sign ensures that as the steric bulk of the ligand increases, E R also increases).…”
Section: The Ligand Repulsive Energy Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the shapes of η 2coordinated olefins are sufficiently far removed from conical to render the cone angle methodology ineffective as a measure of alkene size. 24 The ligand repulsive energy parameter, E R , defined in terms of the change in the van der Waals repulsive energy with distance, or an analogue of this parameter would be expected to be a more reasonable measure of steric interactions. 24,25 In this work we employ a semiquantitative measure of the effect of the size and shape of a ligand on bonding interactions.…”
Section: Fe(co) 3 Dmb +Co (K 6 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 The ligand repulsive energy parameter, E R , defined in terms of the change in the van der Waals repulsive energy with distance, or an analogue of this parameter would be expected to be a more reasonable measure of steric interactions. 24,25 In this work we employ a semiquantitative measure of the effect of the size and shape of a ligand on bonding interactions. The steric repulsive energy, which is qualitatively similar to E R , was calculated using the Tripos force field, available in the Sybyl molecular mechanics program.…”
Section: Fe(co) 3 Dmb +Co (K 6 )mentioning
confidence: 99%