2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-022-01038-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular mechanism of allosteric modulation for the cannabinoid receptor CB1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since, otherwise the maps are very similar, we use only the ZCZ-bound map (as our previous FUB-bound structure was also obtained in the presence of ZCZ) for further discussions. Recently, structures of CB1 bound to ZCZ were determined, showing binding site involving TMs 2, 3 and 4 11 . In neither of our structures do we see any density in the region described in the previous study 11 and hence, we do not model either of the PAMs (ZCZ and AM11517) in our structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since, otherwise the maps are very similar, we use only the ZCZ-bound map (as our previous FUB-bound structure was also obtained in the presence of ZCZ) for further discussions. Recently, structures of CB1 bound to ZCZ were determined, showing binding site involving TMs 2, 3 and 4 11 . In neither of our structures do we see any density in the region described in the previous study 11 and hence, we do not model either of the PAMs (ZCZ and AM11517) in our structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, structures of CB1 bound to ZCZ were determined, showing binding site involving TMs 2, 3 and 4 11 . In neither of our structures do we see any density in the region described in the previous study 11 and hence, we do not model either of the PAMs (ZCZ and AM11517) in our structures. Overall, the mode of G i engagement with the endo-bound CB1 is very similar to the previously determined structure of FUB-bound CB1 complex, except for ∼ 4 Å deviation of the αN of G i between the CB1-G i complexes (Fig S2a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that, although our simulations indicated that stacking or T-shape aromatic interactions between F155 2.42 and F237 4.46 may form transiently in a dynamic context (Figure S9), aromatic interactions between these residues are not present in CB1 crystal structures. Moreover, in mutagenesis experiments the replacement of F155 2.42 by V, an aliphatic but smaller side chain, was shown to increase G i signaling; in contrast, mutation to the aromatic but larger W had the opposite effect . These results suggest the aromaticity of F155 2.42 might not be the determinant factor for its role in the activation process, and also the possibility that the size of the side chain at this location might be important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By comparing the 6d-bound receptor structure with the inactive crystal structure, it can be found that the orthosteric site bound with the agonist exhibits shrinkage. Throughout the simulation, the receptor was in an active-like state as the intracellular region of TM6 was clearly moving outward (this is the most prominent activation feature of class A GPCRs), 25 resulting in the separation of residues (R139 3.50 and T265 6.33 ) whose distances increased from 7.9 Å to greater than 11.0 Å (Figure 9B). The stable hydrogen bond interaction between W280 6.48 and N315 7.45 makes TM7 cooperate with TM6 to undergo a conformational change (Figure 13A).…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial inactive GnRH1R structure was obtained from the GnRH1R-elagolix inactive crystal structure (PDB code: 7BR3). The initial active-like conformation of GnRH1R was downloaded from the GPCRdb website, , a homology model built with the help of MODELLER . For all simulations, we removed the cocrystallized fusion protein from the structure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%