After my acceptance of the kind invitation from Todd Martínez and Mark Johnson, Co-Editors of this journal, to write this article, I had to decide just how to actually do this, given the existence of a fairly personal and extended autobiographical account of recent vintage detailing my youth, education, and assorted experiences and activities at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and later also at Ecole Normale Supérieure in Paris (1). In the end, I settled on a differently styled recounting of the adventures with my students, postdocs, collaborators, and colleagues in trying to unravel, comprehend, describe, and occasionally even predict the manifestations and consequences of the myriad assortment of molecular dances that contribute to and govern the rates and mechanisms of chemical reactions in solution (and elsewhere
TRANSLATIONAL, ROTATIONAL, AND SOLVATION DYNAMICS IN SOLUTIONThis is basically where it all began for me. Beyond their fundamental interest, these three types of dynamics (translational, rotational, and solvation) can be important for chemical reactions in assorted regimes, although admittedly this is perhaps not always so obvious: Translation is relevant for diffusion-controlled and -influenced reactions, water rotation is important for proton transfers (PTs), for example, and solvation dynamics can have a significant effect on any reaction involving the redistribution or rearrangement of charges. I give only brief commentaries on our work at the University of Colorado, Boulder, on these types of dynamics in the 1970s and 1980s and end with more recent aspects carried out at Ecole Normal Supérieure (ENS).In the 1970s, it was thought by not a few that macroscopic continuum hydrodynamics-as reflected in, e.g., Stokes' friction laws for translation and rotation, the Stokes-Einstein equation for translational diffusion, and the Debye-Stokes-Einstein relation for rotational or reorientational diffusion-could actually apply in detail, and even quantitatively, at a molecular level. I myself have used (and continue to use) continuum hydrodynamic and dielectric models to provide concepts, perspectives, and guides for experiment. Clearly, I like such models greatly, but I just could not accept going this far. Together with Mike Weinberg and Ray Kapral (2-4), we addressed the issue with what we called a microscopic boundary layer approach, combining a molecular collisional picture for the immediate solvent neighborhood of a rotating or translating solute molecule with a hydrodynamic description of the remaining, outer solvent. We showed that for both rotational and translational friction (and thus for diffusion), the molecular aspects were indeed dominant. Although hydrodynamic influences could also enter, they only became the dominant story when the solute was far larger than the solvent molecules. We also found that the supposed agreement of assorted simulations and experiments with the hydrodynamic view disappeared upon suitable scrutiny.
Solvation DynamicsThis flavor of dynamics came into it...