2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-011-3167-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular mechanisms of yeast tolerance and in situ detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates

Abstract: Pretreatment of lignocellulose biomass for biofuel production generates inhibitory compounds that interfere with microbial growth and subsequent fermentation. Remediation of the inhibitors by current physical, chemical, and biological abatement means is economically impractical, and overcoming the inhibitory effects of lignocellulose hydrolysate poses a significant technical challenge for lower-cost cellulosic ethanol production. Development of tolerant ethanologenic yeast strains has demonstrated the potentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
146
0
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
6
146
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Much more effort is needed to finally achieve industrially relevant productivity (50). On the other hand, S. cerevisiae has several advantages in industrial production processes, especially in the production of organic acids at low pH values (26,32,50). Accordingly, we did not observe any toxic effects of CCM on S. cerevisiae cells up to its solubility level of 200 mg/liter at pH 3 to 6 (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Much more effort is needed to finally achieve industrially relevant productivity (50). On the other hand, S. cerevisiae has several advantages in industrial production processes, especially in the production of organic acids at low pH values (26,32,50). Accordingly, we did not observe any toxic effects of CCM on S. cerevisiae cells up to its solubility level of 200 mg/liter at pH 3 to 6 (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In contrast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentations can be performed at low pH values. Moreover, S. cerevisiae has further beneficial properties for industrial production processes like high robustness, high resistance to toxic inhibitors and fermentation products, resistance to microbial contamination, and a high level of public acceptance (32,35,50).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include reduction of furfural production by using phosphoric acid rather than sulfuric acid during pretreatment (6,9,10), the isolation of furfural-resistant mutants of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) (19) and bacteria (26), and directed genetic modifications (19,26,33). Native genes have been identified and overexpressed that catalyze furfural reduction with NADH or NADPH in yeast (7,14,17,18) and bacterial biocatalysts (25,33). Furfural and other aldehydes have many biological effects on eukaryotes and prokaryotes which may contribute to the inhibition of growth (36).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These furan aldehydes are known as the most potent inhibitors of microbial cell growth (4,5). The toxic aldehyde groups of furfural and HMF can be reduced to hydroxyl groups by several oxidoreductases, including alcohol dehydrogenases (Adh1, Adh6, and Adh7) (6)(7)(8), aldehyde reductase (Ari1) (9), and methylglyoxal reductases (Gre2 and Gre3) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells (8,(10)(11)(12)(13) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (YqhD) and methylglyoxal reductase (DkgA) in Escherichia coli (14). These enzymes consume NADH and NADPH as cofactors during the reduction process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%