2016
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201695621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular mechanisms that distinguish TFIID housekeeping from regulatable SAGA promoters

Abstract: An important distinction is frequently made between constitutively expressed housekeeping genes versus regulated genes. Although generally characterized by different DNA elements, chromatin architecture and cofactors, it is not known to what degree promoter classes strictly follow regulatability rules and which molecular mechanisms dictate such differences. We show that SAGA‐dominated/TATA‐box promoters are more responsive to changes in the amount of activator, even compared to TFIID/TATA‐like promoters that d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(185 reference statements)
7
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paired‐end 125‐bp reads were aligned with Bowtie 2. Nucleosome dyads were found by taking the middle of each paired read of insert size between 95 and 225 bp (or 140 and 225 bp) and were smoothed with a 31‐bp window, as described in de Jonge et al (). Data are deposited in GEO with accession number: GSE116337.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paired‐end 125‐bp reads were aligned with Bowtie 2. Nucleosome dyads were found by taking the middle of each paired read of insert size between 95 and 225 bp (or 140 and 225 bp) and were smoothed with a 31‐bp window, as described in de Jonge et al (). Data are deposited in GEO with accession number: GSE116337.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In yeast, SAGA predominates at more regulated nonhousekeeping genes (de Jonge et al 2017) and are preferentially used by those with TATA boxes, including those associated with stress (Basehoar et al 2004;Huisinga and Pugh 2004). A more comprehensive genome-wide analysis of all viable SAGA deletion mutants suggests that different modules regulate different sets of genes (Helmlinger et al 2011).…”
Section: Dub and Hat Module Subunits Control Expression Of A Subset Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies suggest that there are at least two broad classes of genes: housekeeping and highly-regulated genes (de Jonge et al, 2016; Eisenberg and Levanon, 2013; Huisinga and Pugh, 2004; Mencía et al, 2002; Ohtsuki et al, 1998; Zabidi and Stark, 2016). These two gene classes differ in their response to transcription activators, chromatin organization and modifications, and in promoter sequence elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%