2008
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00878-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Microbial Diversity Survey of Sponge Reproductive Stages and Mechanistic Insights into Vertical Transmission of Microbial Symbionts

Abstract: Many marine sponges, hereafter termed high-microbial-abundance (HMA) sponges, harbor large and complex microbial consortia, including bacteria and archaea, within their mesohyl matrices. To investigate vertical microbial transmission as a strategy to maintain these complex associations, an extensive phylogenetic analysis was carried out with the 16S rRNA gene sequences of reproductive (n ‫؍‬ 136) and adult (n ‫؍‬ 88) material from five different Caribbean species, as well as all published 16S rRNA gene sequenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
161
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
11
161
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Vertical transmission of single lineages and of complex microbial communities has been shown for several sponges including some of the species investigated in this study (Usher et al, 2001;Oren et al, 2005;Enticknap et al, 2006;Schmitt et al, 2007;Sharp et al, 2007). However, it was previously proposed that vertical transmission is not the only mechanism of symbiont acquisition and that sponge symbionts may additionally be acquired from the seawater (Taylor et al, 2007;Schmitt et al, 2008;Webster et al, 2010). Such a combination of vertical and horizontal/environmental symbiont transmission would explain the lack of correlation between microbial community similarity and sponge phylogeny seen in this and previous studies.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Vertical transmission of single lineages and of complex microbial communities has been shown for several sponges including some of the species investigated in this study (Usher et al, 2001;Oren et al, 2005;Enticknap et al, 2006;Schmitt et al, 2007;Sharp et al, 2007). However, it was previously proposed that vertical transmission is not the only mechanism of symbiont acquisition and that sponge symbionts may additionally be acquired from the seawater (Taylor et al, 2007;Schmitt et al, 2008;Webster et al, 2010). Such a combination of vertical and horizontal/environmental symbiont transmission would explain the lack of correlation between microbial community similarity and sponge phylogeny seen in this and previous studies.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…There is some consensus that sponge-speciesspecific microbial communities are maintained by vertical transmission of specific microbes across different generations of sponges, which is well supported by a number of studies covering sponges of different species or from different oceans (Sharp et al, 2007;Schmitt et al, 2008;Steger et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2009a). Under this scenario, one would believe that ancestral symbionts might have colonized a sponge host before sponge speciation and then coevolved with the host.…”
Section: Influence Of Environment On Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These communities, which can include bacteria, archaea and eukaryotic microorganisms, are often quite specific to sponges, with many microbial phylotypes appearing to live exclusively within sponge hosts and not in the surrounding seawater (Hentschel et al, 2002;Taylor et al, 2007b;Schmitt et al, 2008). Although our understanding of the microbial diversity in sponges is rapidly improving, much remains unknown about the activity of these microbes (Taylor et al, 2007a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of 16S rRNA genes through clone libraries and fingerprinting approaches such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) has greatly extended our knowledge about the phylogenetic richness of sponge-associated bacteria and archaea (Webster et al, 2001(Webster et al, , 2004Hentschel et al, 2002;Taylor et al, 2004Taylor et al, , 2007bHolmes and Blanch, 2006;Longford et al, 2007;Schmitt et al, 2007Schmitt et al, , 2008Thiel et al, 2007;Mohamed et al, 2008b;Zhu et al, 2008). Researchers in other systems have taken this approach one step further, yielding insights into both richness and activity by comparing 16S rRNA gene-and 16S rRNA-derived sequences, respectively (Moeseneder et al, , 2005Winter et al, 2001;Troussellier et al, 2002;Mills et al, 2005;Gentile et al, 2006;Martinez et al, 2006;Brinkmann et al, 2008;McIlroy et al, 2008;West et al, 2008;Rodriguez-Blanco et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%