1995
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560040906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular modeling of a T-cell receptor bound to a major histocompatibility complex molecule: Implications for T-cell recognition

Abstract: The main functions of the T-cell receptor (TCR) involve its specific interaction with short and linear antigenic peptides bound to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. In the absence of a 3D structure for TCR and for the TCR/peptide/MHC complex, several attempts to characterize the structural components of the TCR/peptide/MHC interaction have been made. However, this subject is still troublesome.In this paper a computer-based 3D model for a TCR/peptide/MHC complex (5C.C7/moth cytochrome c [MCC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 6 hydrogen bonds between the TCR and HA peptide (see Table 1), including 2 that were part of a salt bridge between CDR3P El03 and K310 of the HA peptide. However, the alignment of our TCR and MHC molecules in the trimolecular complex was oriented -180" from that reported by Jorgensen et a1 (46) and from that in another model of this TCR-class I1 MHC-peptide complex (5C.C7/1-Ek/moth cytochrome c) (25). However, the alignment of our TCR and MHC molecules in the trimolecular complex was oriented -180" from that reported by Jorgensen et a1 (46) and from that in another model of this TCR-class I1 MHC-peptide complex (5C.C7/1-Ek/moth cytochrome c) (25).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were 6 hydrogen bonds between the TCR and HA peptide (see Table 1), including 2 that were part of a salt bridge between CDR3P El03 and K310 of the HA peptide. However, the alignment of our TCR and MHC molecules in the trimolecular complex was oriented -180" from that reported by Jorgensen et a1 (46) and from that in another model of this TCR-class I1 MHC-peptide complex (5C.C7/1-Ek/moth cytochrome c) (25). However, the alignment of our TCR and MHC molecules in the trimolecular complex was oriented -180" from that reported by Jorgensen et a1 (46) and from that in another model of this TCR-class I1 MHC-peptide complex (5C.C7/1-Ek/moth cytochrome c) (25).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Due to this similarity, previous TCR models derived from immunoglobulin structures have been useful in describing general features of TCR recognition of the MHC-peptide complex (20,(23)(24)(25). Due to this similarity, previous TCR models derived from immunoglobulin structures have been useful in describing general features of TCR recognition of the MHC-peptide complex (20,(23)(24)(25).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the two genetic analyses of class II MHC-restricted TCRs offer a similar topology of interaction to that deduced in this study for the N15 and N26 class I MHC-restricted TCRs with Va overlapping the b1 helix and Vb overlapping the a1 helix. The topology of 5C.C7 interaction with its ligand ®ts well with recent molecular modeling results (Almagro et al, 1995). On the other hand, less direct approaches using class II restricted T cell clones have given con¯icting results (Wucherpfennig et al, 1995;Brawley & Concannon, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Molecular modeling methods tried to address in silico the question of TCR binding mode prediction in various ways, including manual orientation based on experimental data [40], homology modeling [41] [7], or protein-protein docking (private communication). Recently, the study from Roomp et al [4] presented an algorithm dedicated to TCR/pMHC interaction that quite reliably predicted the contacts between the pMHC and the CDR loops, using a training set of existing crystal structures, paving the road for in silico TCR binding mode prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%