Computational Pharmaceutics 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118573983.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Modeling of Block Copolymer Self‐Assembly and Micellar Drug Delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UPSM displayed notable pH plateaus at pH 6.0, as previously observed, whereas the pH of NPSM decreased proportionally with the addition of HCl (Figure a), indicating that UPSM, but not NPSM, has a strong pH buffering effect. Since micellization of UPSM is critical for the pH buffering effect, , and the encapsulated hydrophobic drug may influence the self-assembly and dissociation of micelles, we further evaluated the impact of drug encapsulation on the pH buffering effect of these micelles. The pH titration results confirmed that drug encapsulation had a minimal impact on the pH buffering capabilities: T-NPSM had no obvious pH buffering effect (Figure b), whereas T-UPSM (polymer concentration 1 mg/mL) showed the same pH plateaus at pH 6.0 (Figure a,c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UPSM displayed notable pH plateaus at pH 6.0, as previously observed, whereas the pH of NPSM decreased proportionally with the addition of HCl (Figure a), indicating that UPSM, but not NPSM, has a strong pH buffering effect. Since micellization of UPSM is critical for the pH buffering effect, , and the encapsulated hydrophobic drug may influence the self-assembly and dissociation of micelles, we further evaluated the impact of drug encapsulation on the pH buffering effect of these micelles. The pH titration results confirmed that drug encapsulation had a minimal impact on the pH buffering capabilities: T-NPSM had no obvious pH buffering effect (Figure b), whereas T-UPSM (polymer concentration 1 mg/mL) showed the same pH plateaus at pH 6.0 (Figure a,c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each coarse-grained bead corresponds to several repeat units for polymer chains in experiments. 21 Block copolymers are modeled as a bead-spring sequence where the beads are connected by harmonic springs, F ij s = K(r ij − r 0 ) with K = 100 being the spring constant, r ij is the separation distance between two beads, and r 0 = 1 is the equilibrium bond length with all of the beads having an identical mass. 8 For a tadpole block copolymer, the first and eighth beads of the solvophilic B block are connected (using the same harmonic spring) into a ring structure, as shown in Figure 1b.…”
Section: Simulation Methodology and Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each tadpole and linear diblock copolymers contain N A = 5 solvophobic beads of type A and N B = 8 solvophilic beads of type B, i.e., A 5 B 8 . Each coarse-grained bead corresponds to several repeat units for polymer chains in experiments . Block copolymers are modeled as a bead-spring sequence where the beads are connected by harmonic springs, F ij s = K ( r ij – r 0 ) with K = 100 being the spring constant, r ij is the separation distance between two beads, and r 0 = 1 is the equilibrium bond length with all of the beads having an identical mass .…”
Section: Simulation Methodology and Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To model tadpole and linear diblock copolymers, we employed dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) simulations, , which are well-suited to study the thermodynamics and kinetics of large-scale diblock copolymer assembly. ,,,, We model A 5 B 6 diblock copolymers, where A and B are respectively hydrophobic and hydrophilic beads with the subscript representing the number of coarse-grained units. We note that each coarse-grained unit represents a group of several atoms and in general is larger than a polymer repeat unit . For the tadpole block copolymer, the first and fifth bead of A block are connected (using the same harmonic spring as for a regular chemical bond) into a ring structure, as shown in Figure .…”
Section: Simulation Methodology and Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that each coarsegrained unit represents a group of several atoms and in general is larger than a polymer repeat unit. 42 For the tadpole block copolymer, the first and fifth bead of A block are connected (using the same harmonic spring as for a regular chemical bond) into a ring structure, as shown in Figure 1. Chemical bonds between beads are modeled as harmonic springs, F ij s = K(r ij − r 0 ) with K = 100 being the spring constant, r ij is the separation distance between two beads, and r 0 = 1 is the equilibrium bond length with all the beads having an identical mass.…”
Section: ■ Simulation Methodology and Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%