2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2018.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular modeling on porphyrin derivatives as β5 subunit inhibitor of 20S proteasome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with the fact that CHEMBL3794075 stays closer to THR1 and, therefore, closer to this second set of residues. The level of fluctuation obtained in this work is significantly smaller than RMSF profiles reported for other inhibitors [52].…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Studies To Investigate Dual-inhibitor Hits Produced From Molecular Dockingcontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in line with the fact that CHEMBL3794075 stays closer to THR1 and, therefore, closer to this second set of residues. The level of fluctuation obtained in this work is significantly smaller than RMSF profiles reported for other inhibitors [52].…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Studies To Investigate Dual-inhibitor Hits Produced From Molecular Dockingcontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…This is in line with the fact that CHEMBL3794075 stays closer to THR1 and, therefore, closer to this second set of residues. The level of fluctuation obtained in this work is significantly smaller than RMSF profiles reported for other inhibitors [52]. To assess the particular positioning of the two docking hits with respect to key Hbonding residues, we monitored the shortest distance between each compound and THR1 of the β5 chain of P20S, or HIS307 of EZH2.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Studies To Investigate Dual-inhibitor Hits Produced From Molecular Dockingmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of 100 ns was performed for Compound 12 (Comp12), RA1, RA2, RA3, and RA4, each complexed with EGFR. The details of MD protocol follow our previous work (Arba et al, 2018a). Molecular mechanics-Poisson Boltzmann Surface Area (MM-PBSA) (Kollman et al, 2000) calculation was performed to predict the binding free energy of Comp12, RA1, RA2, RA3 and RA4 to EGFR.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Mm-pbsa Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our last in silico protocol was the calculation of the binding free energy, which was performed using the Molecular Mechanics-Poisson Boltzmann solvent accessible surface area (MM-PBSA) method (Arba et al, 2018a;2018b;Kollman et al, 2000). The binding energy was calculated using 200 snapshots taken from 20 to 40 ns simulation trajectories with the python modules of AMBER16 (Miller et al, 2012).…”
Section: Binding Free Energy Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%