1999
DOI: 10.1021/jp983912k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Orientation at Surfaces:  Surface Roughness Contributions to Measurements Based on Linear Dichroism

Abstract: The molecular orientation at surfaces plays a key role in many of the interesting optical properties of organic thin films. Accurate determination of molecular “tilt” angles and the distribution in tilt angles is essential for an improved understanding of performance characteristics, i.e., the structure−function relationship. While there are several spectroscopic techniques available for measurement of molecular orientation at solid surfaces, little effort has been dedicated to understanding the contributions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…56 For the specific case of 2n ) 2, the expression reproduces the result already reported by others 54 and later derived by Simpson and Rowlen using a different approach to account for surface roughness effects on the second order parameter, 〈P 2 (cos θ)〉. 55 Here, we also extend the expression for any even order parameter, as TIRF experimental results also contain information on 〈P 4 (cos θ)〉. The experimentally determined order parameters relating to θ (the angle between the absorption dipole and the lab surface normal) inherently include these factors, so it is useful to be able to factor them out in order to recover the distribution of the molecule with respect to the local surface plane.…”
Section: Polarized Fluorescencesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…56 For the specific case of 2n ) 2, the expression reproduces the result already reported by others 54 and later derived by Simpson and Rowlen using a different approach to account for surface roughness effects on the second order parameter, 〈P 2 (cos θ)〉. 55 Here, we also extend the expression for any even order parameter, as TIRF experimental results also contain information on 〈P 4 (cos θ)〉. The experimentally determined order parameters relating to θ (the angle between the absorption dipole and the lab surface normal) inherently include these factors, so it is useful to be able to factor them out in order to recover the distribution of the molecule with respect to the local surface plane.…”
Section: Polarized Fluorescencesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…12 It was shown that for an anisotropic media a surface scattering does not affect the retardance values but has an impact on linear dichroism values. 28 The quadratic dependence of α L , α 44 , and α LA on thickness is also confirmed within the experimental range of errors. Moreover, an anisotropic depolarization effect…”
Section: Scb Modelsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…(10) with κ 0 = 0), and a microscopic expression which is derived from density functional theory (Eqs. (14) and (19)). Within the Gaussian approximation we have calculated the ensuing variances for the local interface positions and for its derivatives (Eqs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Unrelated to this latter aspect, in a series of papers Simpson and Rowlen studied the surface roughness contributions to measurements, based on linear dichroism, of the molecular orientations of optically active molecules adsorbed on rough solid surfaces [13,14,15]. In order to infer from such data the local molecular orientation they must be corrected by the effects due to the frozen orientational fluctuations of the rough supporting substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%