2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4622(03)00062-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular origin of the cation selectivity in OmpF porin: single channel conductances vs. free energy calculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
97
1
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
16
97
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the conductance of each monomer closure have also been observed for OmpF. 28 Inactivation of OmpT is also much faster (note the different scale bars for Fig. 1C and F) and occurs at lower voltages than for OmpU, because of different voltage sensitivities, as documented.…”
Section: Behavior Of Ompu and Ompt At Neutral Phsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in the conductance of each monomer closure have also been observed for OmpF. 28 Inactivation of OmpT is also much faster (note the different scale bars for Fig. 1C and F) and occurs at lower voltages than for OmpU, because of different voltage sensitivities, as documented.…”
Section: Behavior Of Ompu and Ompt At Neutral Phsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…16,28,29 It is a hallmark of porin behavior that this inactivation takes place in three distinct steps, believed to correspond to the successive closures of each monomer. 28 The trace of panel C shows that OmpU indeed displays three major closed steps (indicated by tick marks) which may correspond to each monomer, but additional levels of smaller or larger amplitudes are also observed. This is not an idiosyncrasy of patch-clamp, as similar behaviors are observed in planar lipid bilayers as well.…”
Section: Behavior Of Ompu and Ompt At Neutral Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 3 and 4 show that the measurements made with the silicon device were very similar to that of the commercial bilayer cup. The average conductance of a single channel (measured from the size of the step current) was ∼0.7 nS which is very similar to other measurements of OmpF porin channels in 0.5M KCl solution [23,24].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This value is approximately 2 times larger than the ∼1.2 nS conductance experimentally found. A similar restriction on passive ionic transport at high salt concentration has been observed in large water-filled biological channels 28 and in solid-state nanopores 29 and is attributed to surface charge effects. Although the exact thickness of silicon oxide deposited on the back side of the membrane is not known, the result is valid for any reasonable values of the channel length.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%