2019
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular pathology of tumors of the central nervous system

Abstract: Since the update of the 4th edition of the WHO Classification of Central Nervous System (CNS) Tumors published in 2016, particular molecular characteristics are part of the definition of a subset of these neoplasms. This combined ‘histo-molecular’ approach allows for a much more precise diagnosis of especially diffuse gliomas and embryonal CNS tumors. This review provides an update of the most important diagnostic and prognostic markers for state-of-the-art diagnosis of primary CNS tumors. Defining molecular m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
109
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(122 reference statements)
2
109
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Many tumors of the brain stem have characteristic alterations (Dunham, 2015;Kristensen et al, 2019). Perhaps the most successful use for CSF cfDNA has been in the characterization of brain stem tumors, which are inherently difficult and dangerous to biopsy.…”
Section: Brainstem Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many tumors of the brain stem have characteristic alterations (Dunham, 2015;Kristensen et al, 2019). Perhaps the most successful use for CSF cfDNA has been in the characterization of brain stem tumors, which are inherently difficult and dangerous to biopsy.…”
Section: Brainstem Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, most patients receive radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) combined with chemotherapy after surgery. Although the treatment intensity is very high, the outcomes are still not satisfactory [2][3][4][5]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new treatment strategies or regimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the emerge of molecular biology in the 1930s, the discipline has undergone significant changes, which can be largely attributed to the description of DNA as a double-helical structure in 1953, the accomplishment of the Human Genome Project in 2003, and the rapid development of advanced diagnostic technologies. Over the years, cancer diagnostics evolved from gross and microscopic analysis toward an integrated, morphology, and molecular-based approach, leading to improved understanding of carcinogenesis and disease progression [1]. We now understand that cancer is not a monolithic disease and that a tumor is not a homogeneous mass [2]; fighting cancer not only demands an appreciation of inter-patient variability, but also requires us to outwit the intra-tumoral spatial and temporal heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for CNS tumors, based on the improvement of diagnostic technologies, in May 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a revised classification as an update of the 2007 edition [1,6]. For the first time, the WHO uses molecular parameters in addition to histology, which has resulted in the dismissal of a number of entities that are no longer thought to have diagnostic and/or biological value and the appointment of newly recognized neoplasms that should facilitate the development of more effective targeted therapies [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%