Molecular phylogenetics and evolutionary history of the neotropical Satyrine Subtribe Euptychiina (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae)

Murray, Debra; Prowell, Dorothy

doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.08.014

Cited by 54 publications

(87 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Megisto group proposed by Peña et al (2010) was not recovered in previous studies, probably due to a lower taxonomic sampling, although similar groups were recovered (Murray & Prowell 2005, Peña et al 2006. This group is found to be sister to the rest of Euptychiina and consists of the genera {(Palaeonympha + Megisto + [Cissia + (Moneuptychia + Yphthimoides)]}.…”

Section: Marín Et Al From the Phylogeny Of The Satyrinae Bu Erfl Ies mentioning

confidence: 80%

“…The proposed phylogenies of Murray & Prowell (2005) and Peña et al (2006Peña et al ( , 2010 show that Euptychiina sensu is not a monophyletic taxon. Some genera previously regarded as incertae sedis, such as Amphidecta and Palaeonympha, are now included in Euptychiina, and Oressinoma, a genus traditionally recognized as a member of Euptychiina, is more closely related to Coenonymphina (Peña et al 2006).…”

Section: Marín Et Al From the Phylogeny Of The Satyrinae Bu Erfl Ies mentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Investigations conducted so far that have looked at phylogenetic relationships in Euptychiina used DNA sequences of mitochondrial (COI, Cytb and ND1) and nuclear genes (EF-1α, wingless, GAPDH and RpS5) (Murray & Prowell 2005, Peña et al 2006, Marín et al 2009, as well as characters of immature morphology (Murray 2001a). Although the results of Murray (2001a) have not been formally published, they provide important information on immature stages for further investigations on the group.…”

Section: Marín Et Al From the Phylogeny Of The Satyrinae Bu Erfl Ies mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The research on Euptychiina has struggled to show the monophyly of the group (Murray & Prowell 2005, Peña et al 2010. Again, it is believed that this is caused by problems of long branch attraction, particularly in Euptychia (Peña et al 2011), which is recognized as the sister group of the remaining members of the subtribe (Peña et al 2006(Peña et al , 2010.…”

Section: Marín Et Al From the Phylogeny Of The Satyrinae Bu Erfl Ies mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Within the subtribe, the evolutionary reconstruction proposed shows three (Murray & Prowell 2005) to ive clades {(Megisto + (Hermeuptychia + [(Pareuptychia + Taygetis + Splendeuptychia)]} (Peña et al 2010), with some well de ined groups and others that appear to be unnatural taxonomic units (Murray 2001a, Murray & Prowell 2005, Peña et al 2010.…”

Section: Marín Et Al From the Phylogeny Of The Satyrinae Bu Erfl Ies mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

From the Phylogeny of the Satyrinae Butterflies to the Systematics of Euptychiina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): History, Progress and Prospects

Marin¹,

Peña²,

Freitas³

et al. 2011

Neotrop. entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We review the various proposals of evolutionary and classi ication schemes for Satyrinae and particularly Euptychiina butter lies, assessing progress and prospects of research for the group. Among the highlights is the proposal to include Morphini, Brassolini and Amathusiini as part of Satyrinae. Although it is clear that this hypothesis requires further investigation, phylogenetic studies recently conducted recover this clade as part of Satyrinae with high support. The phylogenetic analyses for Euptychiina carried out to date recover the monophyly of the group and have identi ied a variety of genera as non-monophyletic. Further work is necessary to resolve the position of the subtribe and the evolutionary relationships of several genera.

show abstract

Section: Marín Et Al From the Phylogeny Of The Satyrinae Bu Erfl Ies mentioning

confidence: 80%

Section: Marín Et Al From the Phylogeny Of The Satyrinae Bu Erfl Ies mentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Marín Et Al From the Phylogeny Of The Satyrinae Bu Erfl Ies mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Marín Et Al From the Phylogeny Of The Satyrinae Bu Erfl Ies mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Marín Et Al From the Phylogeny Of The Satyrinae Bu Erfl Ies mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

From the Phylogeny of the Satyrinae Butterflies to the Systematics of Euptychiina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): History, Progress and Prospects

Marin¹,

Peña²,

Freitas³

et al. 2011

Neotrop. entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Contrasting Patterns of Temporal Diversification in Neotropical Butterflies: An Overview

Brower

Garzón‐Orduña

2020

Neotropical Diversification: Patterns and Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Host Plant Relationships of the Shoot and Fruit Borer, Conogethes spp. (Crambidae: Lepidoptera): Mechanisms and Determinants

Doddabasappa

Bhanu²,

Subhash

2018

The Black Spotted, Yellow Borer, Conogethes Punctiferalis Guenée and Allied Species

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Molecular phylogenetics and evolutionary history of the neotropical Satyrine Subtribe Euptychiina (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae)

Cited by 54 publications

References 44 publications

From the Phylogeny of the Satyrinae Butterflies to the Systematics of Euptychiina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): History, Progress and Prospects

From the Phylogeny of the Satyrinae Butterflies to the Systematics of Euptychiina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): History, Progress and Prospects

Contrasting Patterns of Temporal Diversification in Neotropical Butterflies: An Overview

Host Plant Relationships of the Shoot and Fruit Borer, Conogethes spp. (Crambidae: Lepidoptera): Mechanisms and Determinants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About