2000
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1999.0697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Phylogenetics of Calamus (Palmae) and Related Rattan Genera Based on 5S nrDNA Spacer Sequence Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current classification of palms , Calamus is placed in subtribe Calaminae (Calameae: Calamoideae) along with four other rattan genera, Ceratolobus Blume (in Schultes & Schultes 1830: lxxx), Daemonorops Blume (in Schultes & Schultes 1830: 1333, Pogonotium Dransfield (1980a: 763) and Retispatha Dransfield (1980b: 529). Subtribe Calaminae is a strongly supported monophyletic group, whereas all available molecular and morphological phylogenetic evidence indicates that Calamus is not, and that the four other genera in the subtribe are variously nested within it (Baker et al 2000a, Baker et al 2000b, c, Baker et al 2009). These studies also indicate that Daemonorops, the second largest genus of Calaminae with ca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current classification of palms , Calamus is placed in subtribe Calaminae (Calameae: Calamoideae) along with four other rattan genera, Ceratolobus Blume (in Schultes & Schultes 1830: lxxx), Daemonorops Blume (in Schultes & Schultes 1830: 1333, Pogonotium Dransfield (1980a: 763) and Retispatha Dransfield (1980b: 529). Subtribe Calaminae is a strongly supported monophyletic group, whereas all available molecular and morphological phylogenetic evidence indicates that Calamus is not, and that the four other genera in the subtribe are variously nested within it (Baker et al 2000a, Baker et al 2000b, c, Baker et al 2009). These studies also indicate that Daemonorops, the second largest genus of Calaminae with ca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…110 species, may not be monophyletic. In the current classification of palms, Dransfield et al (2008) highlighted these systematic issues, but followed Baker et al (2000b) in maintaining the prevailing generic limits, while acknowledging that further phylogenetic research would lead to changes in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 120 bp 5S-rRNA gene sequence is highly conserved across species, while the NTS region exhibits variation in base composition and length (in the range 100-800 bp) from species to species, [9] since it is apparently not under the same rigorous selection pressure as in the coding region. [10][11][12] The high level of conservation of the 5S-rRNA gene is associated with the precise function of 5S-rRNA as a component of the large ribosomal subunit in all eukaryotic organisms. Some regions of the gene are more conserved than others, which is explained by the regulation of 5S-rRNA transcription.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,13] Based on these assumptions, variation in the NTS region has been used in a number of plant species for studying intraspecifi c variation, mapping 5S-rDNA arrays, genome evolution and phylogenetic reconstruction. [9,10,14] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the palm family, a range of molecular data types from plastid DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) (Uhl et al 1995, Wilson et al 1990, plastid DNA coding and noncoding sequence data (Asmussen 1999, Asmussen et al 2000, Asmussen and Chase 2001, Baker et al 2000a, 2000c, Hahn 2002a, 2002b, and nuclear DNA sequence data (Barrow 1999, Baker et al 2000a, 2000b, Hahn 2002a, Loo et al 2006 have been employed.…”
Section: Molecular Phylogeny Of Pinanga (Palmae) Based On Internal Trmentioning
confidence: 99%