2001
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2001.0953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Phylogenetics of the Sexually Deceptive Orchid Genus Ophrys (Orchidaceae) Based on Nuclear and Chloroplast DNA Sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
100
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(45 reference statements)
12
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in good agreement with the close phylogenetic relationships between species in the O. sphegodes complex as inferred from a recent phylogenetic analysis of the genus, in which no differences among species were found in noncoding chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences (Soliva et al 2001).…”
Section: Fig 4 Genotype Assignment Tests Based On Cavalli-sforza's supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are in good agreement with the close phylogenetic relationships between species in the O. sphegodes complex as inferred from a recent phylogenetic analysis of the genus, in which no differences among species were found in noncoding chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences (Soliva et al 2001).…”
Section: Fig 4 Genotype Assignment Tests Based On Cavalli-sforza's supporting
confidence: 91%
“…This study focuses on species in the O. sphegodes complex that comprises 31 species (Delforge 1994) and has its center of diversity in Italy and southern France. We have previously shown in a phylogenetic analysis of Ophrys that species in this complex are closely related (Soliva et al 2001). Species investigated in the present study are similar in floral morphology but can be identified using differences in labellum size, color, and shape.…”
Section: Study Systemmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No differentiation was revealed between allopatric species in the complex or species with confirmed one-to-one pollinator relationships. Patterns of low molecular phylogenetic diversity and high morphological similarity among related species are common in orchids in general (Phillips et al 2012) and sexually deceptive orchids in particular, for example Ophrys (Soliva et al 2001, Soliva andWidmer 2003), Chiloglottis (Mant et al 2005) and Caladenia (Swartz et al 2009). Overall, the sharing of the same vector species among ten reticulata complex species combined with evidence of very low genetic divergence suggested they belong to the same biological species and most likely represent an example of taxonomic over-splitting (Swartz et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certes les définitions des rangs spé-cifique, susbspécifique et variétal demeurent empiriques, mais elles paraissent solides si elles sont éprouvées sur le terrain avant validation. Elles sont néanmoins calibrées par quelques repères d'ordre biologique (Malmgren, 2006) et évolutif (Bateman, 2001 ;Soliva et al, 2001). Il en ressort dans cet ouvrage une classification, limitée à l'Europe, proposant seulement 19 espèces totalisant 65 sous-espèces ainsi que quelques variétés supplémen-taires, auxquelles s'ajoutent cinq complexes hybridogènes partiellement fixés.…”
unclassified