“…These include fossorial species that often evade detection in surveys, such as ichthyophiids, anguids, dibamids, and calamarines; strictly arboreal species that can also evade detection; species that are part of poorly defined taxonomic groups such as those of the genera Dinodon (see , Oligodon (see David et al, 2008b, c), Amphiesma (see , and Draco (see McGuire and Heang, 2001). Combined survey efforts and morphological and molecular analyses will likely resolve some of the wide-ranging cryptic species complexes such as those of the genera Paramesotriton (see , Fejervarya (see Toda et al, 1998a, b;Veith et al, 2001), Limnonectes (see Emerson et al, 2000;Evans et al, 2003;, Odorrana (see Fei et al, 2001;Li et al, 2001;Bain et al, , 2009cOrlov et al, 2006c), Hylarana (see Murphy et al, 1997;Matsui et al, 2002), Polypedates (see He, 1999;Orlov et al, 2002b;, Rhacophorus (see Ohler and Delorme, 2006), Calotes (see Zug et al, 2006), Leiolepis (see Schmitz et al, 2001), Takydromus (see Lin et al, 2002), Dixonius (see Ota et al, 2001), Emoia (see Emilio et al, 1996), Naja (see Wü ster and Thorpe, 1992), possibly Sacalia (Shi et al, 2008), and several genera of green tree vipers (see Malhotra and Thorpe, 2004a, b). This will result in an increase in the number of endemic species and a concomitant decrease in the number of widespread species.…”