2019
DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogeny and evolution of phenotype in silica‐scaled chrysophyte genus Mallomonas

Abstract: The evolution of phenotypes is highly understudied in protists, due to the dearth of morphological characters, missing fossil record, and/or unresolved phylogeny in the majority of taxa. The chrysophyte genus Mallomonas (Stramenopiles) forms species‐specific silica scales with extraordinary diversity of their ornamentation. In this paper, we molecularly characterized three additional species to provide an updated phylogeny of 43 species, and combined this with evaluations of 24 morphological traits. Using phyl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(128 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, a consistent system of morphological criteria for distinguishing taxa has only been developed for a small number of chrysophytes (orders Synurales and Paraphysomonadales and some representatives of Chromulinales and Ochromonadales). This morphological system is consistent with the available molecular genetic information on these taxa [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Although sexual reproduction is known among chrysophytes [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ], the biological species concept is difficult to apply to this group, and the morphological species concept, which is based on the presence or absence of distinct taxonomic features, remains the most useful.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…To date, a consistent system of morphological criteria for distinguishing taxa has only been developed for a small number of chrysophytes (orders Synurales and Paraphysomonadales and some representatives of Chromulinales and Ochromonadales). This morphological system is consistent with the available molecular genetic information on these taxa [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Although sexual reproduction is known among chrysophytes [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ], the biological species concept is difficult to apply to this group, and the morphological species concept, which is based on the presence or absence of distinct taxonomic features, remains the most useful.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, among this large group, there are species with siliceous covers (scales, spines, and bristles), which have a complex ultrastructure and provide reliable characteristics for morphological species differentiation [29]. Moreover, the developed system of morphological criteria for distinguishing taxa (morphological species concept) is considered one of the best among the protists and, in general, has been confirmed with molecular data [29,[31][32][33][34][35]. Hence, the majority of the known species of silica-scaled chrysophytes can be identified correctly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Taking into account morphological characters and molecular data, it was proposed to distinguish synuralean algae into a separate class, Synurophyceae [9,10]; however, recent molecular studies of the chrysophytes phylogeny clearly showed their position among Chrysophyceae [1]. The species concept for this group is based on the morphology of siliceous structures (scales and bristles), studied by transmission or scanning electron microscopy (TEM or SEM) [3], and is considered one of the best among the protists and generally confirmed by molecular methods [11,12]. Electron microscopy studies of synuralean algae began in the 1950s [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%