2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2007.00272.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogeny and ultrastructure of Selenidium serpulae (Apicomplexa, Archigregarinia) from the calcareous tubeworm Serpula vermicularis (Annelida, Polychaeta, Sabellida)

Abstract: 213 Leander, B. S. (2007). Molecular phylogeny and ultrastructure of Selenidium serpulae (Apicomplexa, Archigregarinia) from the calcareous tubeworm Serpula vermicularis (Annelida, Polychaeta, Sabellida). 36 ,[213][214][215][216][217][218][219][220][221][222][223][224][225][226][227] Archigregarines are dynamic single-celled parasites that inhabit the intestinal systems of marine invertebrates, especially suspension feeding and deposit feeding polychaetes. Certain archigregarines in the genus Selenidium have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
60
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worthwhile to note here that an article published this year (Clopton ) argued strongly against the predominant use of molecular phylogenetic data for describing gregarine species, and perhaps organisms in general, in favor of a set of ideological rules based on detailed analyses of morphometric data; the promotion of these rules is intended to govern the way new species of gregarines should be described in the future. As reflected in our previous studies (Landers and Leander ; Leander ; Leander et al. ; Rueckert and Leander ; Rueckert et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worthwhile to note here that an article published this year (Clopton ) argued strongly against the predominant use of molecular phylogenetic data for describing gregarine species, and perhaps organisms in general, in favor of a set of ideological rules based on detailed analyses of morphometric data; the promotion of these rules is intended to govern the way new species of gregarines should be described in the future. As reflected in our previous studies (Landers and Leander ; Leander ; Leander et al. ; Rueckert and Leander ; Rueckert et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This concept promotes the inference that Selenidium species have retained several morphological, ecological, and life history traits from distant ancestors that provide compelling insights into the earliest stages of apicomplexan evolution (Barta and Thompson ; Cox ; Dyson et al. ; Leander , ; Leander and Keeling ). Therefore, continued exploration of Selenidium diversity is expected to shed considerable light onto the deepest relationships within the phylogeny of apicomplexans and onto patterns of co‐evolution between gregarine apicomplexans and marine metazoan hosts (Leander ; Rueckert and Leander ; Théodoridès ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been proposed that together they represent a unicellular analogue to the musculocuticular system of nematodes, in which longitudinal muscles function antagonistically against an elastic cuticle [41, 58]. Despite the striking similarity in motility mode and mechanism with Selenidium , however, the surface of S .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular phylogenetic analyses of small subunit (SSU) rDNA sequences have reinforced this view by showing that species of archigregarines tend to have relatively short branches and represent five different lineages along the unresolved backbone of the apicomplexan tree; one of which, Veloxidium , forms the sister lineage to a diverse clade of marine lecudinids (Wakeman and Leander ). These results provide a compelling example for how the use of molecular phylogenetic approaches and increased sampling of new species have improved our understanding of gregarine diversity and evolutionary history (Leander , ; Rueckert and Leander ; Wakeman and Leander , ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%