2016
DOI: 10.4238/gmr.15017198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogeny of Lathyrus species: insights from sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers were used to evaluate the intra-and interspecific variation among 40 Lathyrus genotypes (four species) (Fabaceae). Ten SRAP primer combinations resulted in a total of 94 bands, and they exhibited high interspecific variability. The genetic differentiation among Lathyrus, estimated using AMOVA, was highly significant. The results indicated that 58% of the total genetic variation existed among species, and 42% of the differentiation was within spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The molecular markers can be used to identify the positions, number, effect of genes or quantitative trait loci that controls pest, disease, protein, β-ODAP concentration, and other traits (Campbell et al 1993). For this purpose, RAPD, RFLP, SRAP, AFLP (Marghali et al 2016) and the microsatellite or simple sequence repeat markers are appropriate (Soren et al 2015). The expressed sequence tags available in public domain databases are very limited for Lathyrus.…”
Section: Genetic Research In Lathyrus Sativusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular markers can be used to identify the positions, number, effect of genes or quantitative trait loci that controls pest, disease, protein, β-ODAP concentration, and other traits (Campbell et al 1993). For this purpose, RAPD, RFLP, SRAP, AFLP (Marghali et al 2016) and the microsatellite or simple sequence repeat markers are appropriate (Soren et al 2015). The expressed sequence tags available in public domain databases are very limited for Lathyrus.…”
Section: Genetic Research In Lathyrus Sativusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic diversity in the Lathyrus genus can be detected by means of diverse molecular markers, including, among others, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and sequencerelated amplified polymorphism (SRAP) (Chtourou- Ghorbel et al 2001;Marghali et al 2016;Nosrati et al 2012;Tavoletti and Iommarini 2007). Another widely used class of molecular markers are simple sequence repeat (SSR) or microsatellite markers that can be obtained by searching in the expressed sequence tags (ESTs) available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank for Lathyrus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genba nk/dbest /dbest _summa ry/) (Lioi et al 2011;Ponnaiah et al 2011;Shiferaw et al 2012;Sun et al 2012;Lioi and Galasso 2013;Soren et al 2015;Gupta et al 2018).…”
Section: Molecular Toolbox For Variety Ameliorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low ODAP (0.04-0.1%) BARI Khesari-1, BARI Khesari-2, BARI Khesari-3, BARI Khesari-4, BARI Khesari-5 BINA Khesari-1 Bangladesh Malek et al, 1996;Kumar et al, 2013 Ratan, Prateek, P-24, Mahateora, Nirmal, Bidhan Khesari-1 India Lal et al, 1985;Pandey et al, 1996 for measuring variability among the Ethiopian grass pea resulted in non-significant correlation with morphological diversity (Tadesse and Bekele, 2001). In grass pea breeding programs, diverse molecular markers like random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD); restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP); amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP); inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR); expressed sequence tag-simple sequence repeats (EST-SSR); sequence-related amplification polymorphism (SRAP); and sequence tagged site (STS) have been utilized for deciphering diversity and phylogenetic relationship among the species (Hanada and Hirai, 2000;Chtourou-Ghorbel et al, 2001;Tavoletti and Iommarini, 2007;Lioi et al, 2011;Shiferaw et al, 2012;Soren et al, 2015;Marghali et al, 2016;Gupta et al, 2018).…”
Section: Traitmentioning
confidence: 99%