2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2012.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogeny of Trissolcus species (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of that study confirmed the placement of Trissolcus in Telenominae with very high bootstrap support. Guz et al (2013) were the first to investigate the relationships within Trissolcus using molecular data. Here the focus was on Trissolcus species that were natural enemies of the sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) of wheat and barley.…”
Section: A History Of Phylogenetics In Trissolcusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of that study confirmed the placement of Trissolcus in Telenominae with very high bootstrap support. Guz et al (2013) were the first to investigate the relationships within Trissolcus using molecular data. Here the focus was on Trissolcus species that were natural enemies of the sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) of wheat and barley.…”
Section: A History Of Phylogenetics In Trissolcusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the focus was on Trissolcus species that were natural enemies of the sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) of wheat and barley. While the study has limited utility with respect to relationships within the genus, Guz et al (2013) demonstrated the usefulness of the COI marker for species-level questions, and reported that due to insertions, ITS2 was difficult to align, and that 28S, 18S, and 5.8S were too conserved to be informative. Taekul et al (2014) included 12 species of Trissolcus in an analysis that redefined the limits of Telenominae.…”
Section: A History Of Phylogenetics In Trissolcusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification was achieved by comparing the contiguous 16S rRNA sequences obtained with the 16S rRNA sequence data from the reference and type strain available in the public database 16S rRNA sequences (Bacteria and Archaea) and Nucleotide collection (nr/nt) using the BLASTn sequence match routines. The sequences were aligned using the Clustal W program and analyzed with MEGA 5.10 [20]. The phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using the neighbor joining (NJ) algorithm, with bootstrap values calculated from 1,000 replicate runs, using the routines included in the MEGA software [21].…”
Section: Isolation Screening and Identification Of The Microorganismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertex between lateral ocelli with hyperoccipital carina (Figures 43,72); carina sometimes weakened medially (Figures 47,200,(206)(207); clypeus with 4 or fewer setae 85,92,221 At intersection with malar sulcus, orbital furrow expanded with medial margin well-defined 48,84,(86)(87)93) (Figures 37,88,133,197,219); vertex with hyperoccipital carina uniform and robust (Figures 72,89) ........6 Gena distinctly broad and bulging in lateral view ( Figure 213); compound eye with posterior and dorsal margins separated from hyperoccipital carina by a broad furrow (Figure 213 Frons above antennal scrobe with irregular raised lines ( Figures 92-93); mesoscutum with microsculpture effaced posteriorly ( Figure 91); median lobe of mesoscutum with oblique rugulae ( Figure 91); mesoscutellum entirely smooth (Figure 91 [95][96]104); mesopleuron with a single episternal fovea (Figures 103,105) or foveae entirely absent ( Figure 94); T1 without longitudinal striae posterior to basal costae (Figures 95,104) .21 -Mesoscutum with notauli (164)(165)(166)(167)210,214); mesopleuron with episternal foveae extending from postacetabular sulcus to mesopleural pit (Figures 154,209,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%