1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01555-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogeography, intraspecific variation and the conservation of tree species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

11
248
1
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 350 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
11
248
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For many widespread tree species, it is precisely the populations at the edge of the distribution range that accumulate most of the intraspecific genetic variation, either because they correspond to glacial (micro-) refugia (for example, Kelly et al, 2010;Anderson et al, 2011), or because they represent contact zones between migrants from such refugia (Hewitt, 2004;Magri et al, 2006). Conservation of natural marginal populations of species has therefore long been considered crucial for the preservation of genetic diversity and evolutionary potential (Newton et al, 1999;Moritz, 2002). Usually, only populations thought to be native are prioritized for conservation (for example, in the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN, 2001)), and populations thought to be introduced or of dubious status are typically not protected (Decocq et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many widespread tree species, it is precisely the populations at the edge of the distribution range that accumulate most of the intraspecific genetic variation, either because they correspond to glacial (micro-) refugia (for example, Kelly et al, 2010;Anderson et al, 2011), or because they represent contact zones between migrants from such refugia (Hewitt, 2004;Magri et al, 2006). Conservation of natural marginal populations of species has therefore long been considered crucial for the preservation of genetic diversity and evolutionary potential (Newton et al, 1999;Moritz, 2002). Usually, only populations thought to be native are prioritized for conservation (for example, in the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN, 2001)), and populations thought to be introduced or of dubious status are typically not protected (Decocq et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution and genetic diversity of plant species have been deeply modified by Pleistocene glaciations (Comes and Kadereit, 1998;Hewitt, 1999Hewitt, , 2004Newton et al, 1999;Abbott and Brochmann, 2003). During glaciations, the ranges of species changed and some ancestral populations became extinct, and recolonization subsequently occurred during interglacial periods (Widmer and Lexer, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During glaciations, the ranges of species changed and some ancestral populations became extinct, and recolonization subsequently occurred during interglacial periods (Widmer and Lexer, 2001). The species genomes were dramatically influenced by these processes, and molecular markers can be used to infer the phylogeographic pattern of species in response to the Pleistocene climatic changes (Newton et al, 1999;Shen et al, 2002;Abbott and Comes, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I assess intraspecific variation, treating each species as differentially adapted along climatic and geographic space without the complexity of genetic subspecies differentiation or provenance studies (Newton et al. 1999). In the process, I analyze how environmental variability within and among broadly defined climatic zones can affect abundance, mortality, and regeneration measures, and specifically investigate how the cold adapted, leading zone of the range differs from the warm adapted, trailing zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%