2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44864-0_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Potential Energy Surfaces by Interpolation

Abstract: Abstract. The molecular potential energy surface governs the motion of the atomic nuclei for a molecule in an isolated electronic state. For a molecule of N atoms, this surface is a function of 3N-6 internal coordinates which determine the shape of the molecule. For molecules undergoing chemical reaction, the surface is a relatively complicated function of these many coordinates. Methods have now been developed which allow us to construct this surface as an interpolation of Taylor expansions of the surface aro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various techniques exist to construct surrogate PESs, such as modified Shepard interpolation, permutationally invariant polynomials, , interpolative moving least squares, Gaussian processes, , neural networks (nn-PES), and the finite-element method . Most of these methods are primarily concerned with constructing a full PES as a function of 3 N – 6 internal coordinates representing bond lengths, bond angles, and torsion angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various techniques exist to construct surrogate PESs, such as modified Shepard interpolation, permutationally invariant polynomials, , interpolative moving least squares, Gaussian processes, , neural networks (nn-PES), and the finite-element method . Most of these methods are primarily concerned with constructing a full PES as a function of 3 N – 6 internal coordinates representing bond lengths, bond angles, and torsion angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31,32] Another broad class of ML methods instead looks at the configuration of the entire system and predicts the energy gradients of all the atoms in the system at once. These types of ML often use linear interpolation [33,34,35,36,37], reproducing kernel interpolation [38,39,40,41,42,43], or kernel ridge regression. [44,45] The molecular systems that serve as proof of concepts in those ML developments are mostly close-to-optimal structures, for example, oscillations of atoms in metal or vibrations of molecules at a relatively high temperature (up to 500 K).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, more efficient methods to obtain information about the PES are required. The force field methods, which represent the potential energy as a sum of different contributions with empirical function forms, are widely used on simulations of biomolecules and polymers. ,,, However, improving the accuracy of force field parameters to match the experimental and ab initio MD results is, for some cases, hard to achieve because of the limitation of functional form that describes different types of interactions and the requirement for parameters to be transferrable among different systems. To efficiently carry out reliable MD simulations in these situations, different approaches have been developed to approximate the PES of a specified system, including, but not limited to, the modified Shepard interpolation method developed by Collins, permutationally invariant potential energy surface by linear least-square fitting developed by Braams and Bowman, ,, neural network approaches, Gaussian process, , and finite element method. The size of a system that can be treated by these full-dimensional PES (f-PES) MD methods is very limited because the computational cost increases rapidly with the increase of degrees of freedom (dofs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%