2014
DOI: 10.17221/7380-vetmed
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular prevalence and risk factors for the occurrence of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis

Abstract: Evaluation of blood samples collected from 214 dogs from Ludhiana, Punjab (India) was performed for the presence of Ehrlichia canis using PCR-based assays targeting a portion of the 16S rRNA gene. Of the total samples subjected to routine blood smear examination, the morulae of E. canis were detected in 2.34% samples. Nested PCR assay produced amplicons of expected size (389 bp) specific for E. canis in 41.59% (89/214) of samples. The results of multivariate analysis showed that the prevalence of E. canis was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
25
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
25
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Milanjeet [7] found 2.34% of cases to be positive for E. canis morulae in the same region of Punjab. Dhankar et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milanjeet [7] found 2.34% of cases to be positive for E. canis morulae in the same region of Punjab. Dhankar et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canine ehrlichiosis is a rickettsial bacteria disease of dogs that has worldwide distribution (Engvall et al, 1996;McBride et al, 1996;Souza et al, 2010;Fourie et al, 2013;Milanjeet et al, 2014;Cardoso et al, 2016;Cicuttin et al, 2016;Kaewmongkol et al, 2016). Two forms of the disease are known in dogs and humans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence and molecular characteristics of Ehrlichia canis have been studied extensively around the world (Suksawat et al, 2001;Unver et al, 2001;Vinasco et al, 2007;Aguiar et al, 2008;Harrus et al, 2011;Nazari et al, 2013;Milanjeet et al, 2014;Cardoso et al, 2016). One of these studies has revealed that more than one strain may exist in a region (Vinasco et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same group in their molecular studies through nested PCR in 2016 in the same city detected meagre 0.39% prevalence of E. canis DNA in pet dogs. Milanjeet et al (2014) from the same Ludhiana city reveals prevalence of 2.34% by microscopy and 41.59% by PCR. In a recent study from the same location by Kottadamane et al (2017), prevalence of 14.28% and 86.90% were reported by microscopy and serology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Till date, studies on CME from India have been carried out in small geographical locations (cities/towns/small states) and that too, they have been carried out either on pet or on stray dogs and somehow, majority of these studies fail to address the clinical and diagnostic challenges being presently posed by the disease (Juyal et al, 1994;Samaradni et al, 2003;Lakshmanan et al, 2006;Wise and Tarlinton, 2012;Abd Rani et al, 2011;Singla et al, 2011;Milanjeet et al, 2014;Bhadesiya and Raval, 2015;Singla et al, 2016;Kottadamane et al, 2016Kottadamane et al, , 2017. Besides these lacunae, these prevalence studies were also solely based on either commercial serology kit or on molecular based techniques and thus failed to analyse the practical relevance of both the methodologies in existing field conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%