2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-1403-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular probes and microarrays for the detection of toxic algae in the genera Dinophysis and Phalacroma (Dinophyta)

Abstract: Dinophysis and Phalacroma species containing diarrheic shellfish toxins and pectenotoxins occur in coastal temperate waters all year round and prevent the harvesting of mussels during several months each year in regions in Europe, Chile, Japan, and New Zealand. Toxicity varies among morphologically similar species, and a precise identification is needed for early warning systems. Molecular techniques using ribosomal DNA sequences offer a means to identify and detect precisely the potentially toxic species. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the development of next-generation sequencing methods, microbial identification can be carried out in a faster and less labour-intensive way (Graham et al, 2015) and had been shown to effectively identify specific contaminants in algae cultivation reactors (Wichers et al, 2016) or toxic algal species (Edvardsen et al, 2013). When pond or photobioreactor performance is abnormal, a retrospective analysis of the archived samples could reveal harmful contaminants and inappropriate operation strategies.…”
Section: Identification and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the development of next-generation sequencing methods, microbial identification can be carried out in a faster and less labour-intensive way (Graham et al, 2015) and had been shown to effectively identify specific contaminants in algae cultivation reactors (Wichers et al, 2016) or toxic algal species (Edvardsen et al, 2013). When pond or photobioreactor performance is abnormal, a retrospective analysis of the archived samples could reveal harmful contaminants and inappropriate operation strategies.…”
Section: Identification and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laser in a microarray scanner scans the slides and the hybridization pattern captured via fluorescent excitation indicates which species are present [ 60 ]. DNA microarrays, or phylochips as they have been termed, have been used to identify phytoplankton [ 63 ], toxic algae [ 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 ], bacteria [ 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ], and eggs and larvae from fish species [ 85 ]. Phylochip ® , a universal microarray for all prokaryotic organisms is commercially available and circumvents the long analysis time to perform community analysis for the prokaryotes using other molecular tools.…”
Section: Molecular—cell-free Formatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this system shows great promise for the high-throughput species-level identification of HAS. From our literature search, it has become apparent that a potential issue with RNA biosensors may be due to discrepancies between cell numbers determined by rRNA measurement and direct cell counting, which is due to varying amounts of RNA per cell, a factor that is dependent of cell size and growth rate [33]. Thus, this factor would need thorough investigation and correlation to current techniques prior to the deployment of such RNA biosensors.…”
Section: Biosensors To Detect Harmful Algal Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%