2002
DOI: 10.1007/s005340200000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular prognostic markers in pancreatic cancer

Abstract: Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis and is a common cause of cancer death in the Western world. Certain genetic alterations may be important in the prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Activation mutations in the K- ras oncogene occur in around 90% of pancreatic cancers, and the overexpression of growth factors epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor (TGF)alpha, TGFbetas 1-3, acidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF), basic FGF (bFGF), and growth factor receptors c-erbB-2 and -3 and TGFRbetas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many epithelial tumor entities including gastric and cervical cancer as well as cancers of head, neck, breast and lung express high levels of EGF, TGF-β1 and TNF-α, which are associated with advanced disease and poor clinical prognosis (Stuelten et al, 2005;Jakowlew et al, 2006;Van et al, 2006;Bussink et al, 2008;Wu et al, 2009). Higher level expression of EGF, TGF-β1 and TNF-α have been inversely correlated to survival in these patients and high expression levels have been found in advanced tumor stages (Friess et al, 1999;Ghaneh et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Many epithelial tumor entities including gastric and cervical cancer as well as cancers of head, neck, breast and lung express high levels of EGF, TGF-β1 and TNF-α, which are associated with advanced disease and poor clinical prognosis (Stuelten et al, 2005;Jakowlew et al, 2006;Van et al, 2006;Bussink et al, 2008;Wu et al, 2009). Higher level expression of EGF, TGF-β1 and TNF-α have been inversely correlated to survival in these patients and high expression levels have been found in advanced tumor stages (Friess et al, 1999;Ghaneh et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There is increasing evidence showing the usefulness of immunohistochemical analysis of molecular markers, including EGFR, for predicting the clinical outcome of PDAC patients (10,11,13,25,26). Immunohistochemical analysis is a valid method as it shows protein expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the conventional Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging system, which is defined by tumor size, tumor progression, lymph node involvement, and distant metastasis (15), is useful for PDAC classification, the outcome is poor for patients even in the low-stage (I and II) groups (5). Therefore, the prognostic use of several molecular markers for PDAC classification have been investigated (8), although none proved useful for predicting patient prognosis (9). We undertook the present study to determine whether Akt2, p-Akt, and p-ERK expression and the proliferation activity seen by Ki-67 LI are valid biological indicators of the aggressiveness of PDAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The altered expression of genes such as the K-ras oncogene frequently occurs during the development of PDAC (8). However, specific patterns of gene alternations responsible for PDAC have not been identified (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%