1976
DOI: 10.3758/bf03326600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular psychobiology of memory: Its appearance, contributions, and decline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these expectations have been strengthened through experimentation, whereas others were ultimately discarded (cf. Chapouthier 1989;Gaito 1976). One reasonable expectation is that learning is accompanied by an increase in the efficiency of communication between neurons, a concept with extensive historical antecedents (see, e.g., James 1892;Spencer 1870;Tanzi 1893).…”
Section: Multiple Definitions Of Ltpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these expectations have been strengthened through experimentation, whereas others were ultimately discarded (cf. Chapouthier 1989;Gaito 1976). One reasonable expectation is that learning is accompanied by an increase in the efficiency of communication between neurons, a concept with extensive historical antecedents (see, e.g., James 1892;Spencer 1870;Tanzi 1893).…”
Section: Multiple Definitions Of Ltpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To propose important, but premature, questions and expect significant answers to emerge mysteriously from inappropriate methodologies may hinder progress much more than pedestrian questions asked within the context of a sophisticated experimental methodology. As is well known, the ideas and methods of molecular biology which were incorporated into the search for the molecular bases of memory during the last two decades generated many significant theoretical questions and much data, but produced little of substantial value (Gaito, 1976). Is it premature then to expect a synthesis among the biological, ethological, and psychological disciplines to generate significant generalizations about the adaptive behavior of developing animals continuously interacting with their environments?…”
Section: Associative Learning Influences On Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intriguing area about the worms' spatial learning was first investigated by behavioral scientists in the 1950s-1960s, by training worms to go through a T-maze 13 or a triangle maze 2 lack of water to return to watery places, which made the worms show a preference to the direction of the watery places, even the worms regenerated from a trained worm's tail showed a preference 14 . However, these experiments were criticized for poor variable control and reproducibility 15 , nor could they demonstrate the real information that worms are truly processing. Recent research with large samples revealed that the worms can form familiarity with the environment to start feeding but still unable to illustrate what the familiarity is 16 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%