2011
DOI: 10.2174/138161211796355056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Recognition in the Case of Flexible Targets

Abstract: A protein’s flexibility is well recognized to underlie its capacity to engage in critical functions, such as signal transduction, biomolecular transport and biochemical reactivity. Molecular recognition is also tightly linked to the dynamics of the binding partners, yet protein flexibility has largely been ignored by the growing field of structure-based drug design (SBDD). In combination with experimentally determined structures, a number of computational methods have been proposed to model protein movements, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the key characteristics of DMEs (CYPs, SULTs) is that they are promiscuous, showing a remarkable plasticity of the active site to adapt its conformation to diverse ligands [12,14,17,35,36]. Therefore, we explored the flexibility of SULTs by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in order to elucidate the molecular mechanisms involved in ligand binding and to identify the most suitable multiple receptor conformations for ligand binding prediction [29,3739]. Then, we employed a structure-based docking-scoring approach [34,40,41] to probe ligand binding and finally we combined the predicted interaction energies with a QSAR methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key characteristics of DMEs (CYPs, SULTs) is that they are promiscuous, showing a remarkable plasticity of the active site to adapt its conformation to diverse ligands [12,14,17,35,36]. Therefore, we explored the flexibility of SULTs by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in order to elucidate the molecular mechanisms involved in ligand binding and to identify the most suitable multiple receptor conformations for ligand binding prediction [29,3739]. Then, we employed a structure-based docking-scoring approach [34,40,41] to probe ligand binding and finally we combined the predicted interaction energies with a QSAR methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2125 An important advance in accounting for target flexibility has been to dock the same ligand library to multiple different static conformations of the same target. 26,27 Approaches to generating target conformational ensembles have included using multiple different experimental atomic-resolution structures of the same protein 28,29 or multiple different conformations generated by in silico methods such as MD or Monte Carlo simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 This inherent protein flexibility presents an important complication for computer-based approaches in drug discovery, as it is effectively harder to hit a moving target. 9,10 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%