2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2006.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular scale investigations of the reactivity of magnetite with formic acid, pyridine, and carbon tetrachloride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
7
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 43) [294]. The third termination observed by Cutting et al [304] appears similar to the honeycomb structure observed by Shimizu et al [107]. However, since this surface was found to be completely inert in adsorption experiments, Cutting et al [304] (111) surface is terminated by a single phase, and this must be borne in mind in the interpretation of data from area averaging techniques.…”
Section: How To Prepare and Recognise The Scv Surfacesupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 43) [294]. The third termination observed by Cutting et al [304] appears similar to the honeycomb structure observed by Shimizu et al [107]. However, since this surface was found to be completely inert in adsorption experiments, Cutting et al [304] (111) surface is terminated by a single phase, and this must be borne in mind in the interpretation of data from area averaging techniques.…”
Section: How To Prepare and Recognise The Scv Surfacesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The third termination observed by Cutting et al [304] appears similar to the honeycomb structure observed by Shimizu et al [107]. However, since this surface was found to be completely inert in adsorption experiments, Cutting et al [304] (111) surface is terminated by a single phase, and this must be borne in mind in the interpretation of data from area averaging techniques. Moreover, other than the Fe tet1 termination, the structure of the other frequently observed terminations has not been determined using quantitative structural techniques, and further work is needed to establish the details of the Fe oct2 termination.…”
Section: How To Prepare and Recognise The Scv Surfacesupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the conditions typically used in temperature programmed desorption/reaction (TPD, TPR) studies, the FeO films were essentially inert towards molecular adsorption (carbon monoxide, water, ethylbenzene and styrene). Therefore, the adsorption studies were primarily focused on surfaces of magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ) and hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ) (see also [19,20]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33] The formation of dichlorocarbene (CCl 2 ) at the surface has been proven by adsorption of CCl 4 on Fe 3 O 4 studied by STM. [34] Moreover, it was found that the CCl 2 fragment is mobile on the surface at 298 K. Koper et al found from pulse experiments that CHCl 3 is initially converted on CaO into CO exclusively, whereas the addition of larger amounts resulted in the formation of COCl 2 and C 2 Cl 4 . Hydration of CaO led to the formation of COCl 2 and C 2 Cl 4 after the introduction of lower amounts of CHCl 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%