1966
DOI: 10.1080/01496396608049432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular-Sieve Chromatography of Proteins on Granulated Polyacrylamide Gels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A proposed radius size of 0.15 nm for the acrylamide fibers is rather small and may not reflect realistic features of the gel. In contrast to the present study of water diffusion, the previous research (65,27) investigated the transport properties of much larger proteins (1.6 -9 nm). It is therefore useful to consider other factors such as adsorption that may account for the decrease in the observed diffusion coefficients in gels.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A proposed radius size of 0.15 nm for the acrylamide fibers is rather small and may not reflect realistic features of the gel. In contrast to the present study of water diffusion, the previous research (65,27) investigated the transport properties of much larger proteins (1.6 -9 nm). It is therefore useful to consider other factors such as adsorption that may account for the decrease in the observed diffusion coefficients in gels.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In deriving this equation, Mackie and Meares (73) assumed that the obstacles, that is, lattice sites or polymer fibers in the present study, are of the same size as the solutes. Although, the polymer fiber size is expected to be larger (approximately 1-nm radius (65,27)) than that of the water molecule (radius equal to 0.15 nm), the model predicted water diffusion coefficients in gels fairly well. Therefore, the major problems with using the Mackie-Meares theory are that it fails to account for adsorption effects and that the validity of the assumption concerning the relative size of fibers to solute size is questionable.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations