2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular signatures of two cattail species, Typha domingensis and Typha latifolia (Typhaceae), in South Florida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These SSR markers should be useful for identifying hybrids and introgressed individuals in North American cattail populations because (1) our samples were collected over a broad geographic area (31 populations in six states), (2) most F 1 hybrid individuals had one diagnostic SSR allele from each parent, as expected, (3) putative hybrids and hybrid derivatives had intermediate phenotypes, as expected, and (4) analyses carried out in separate laboratories gave consistent results. Further analyses of the genetics of hybridizing populations could be carried out using cytoplasmic markers to determine the maternal parents of naturally occurring progeny from interspecific crosses (e.g., Kuehn et al, 1999; Zhang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These SSR markers should be useful for identifying hybrids and introgressed individuals in North American cattail populations because (1) our samples were collected over a broad geographic area (31 populations in six states), (2) most F 1 hybrid individuals had one diagnostic SSR allele from each parent, as expected, (3) putative hybrids and hybrid derivatives had intermediate phenotypes, as expected, and (4) analyses carried out in separate laboratories gave consistent results. Further analyses of the genetics of hybridizing populations could be carried out using cytoplasmic markers to determine the maternal parents of naturally occurring progeny from interspecific crosses (e.g., Kuehn et al, 1999; Zhang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous attempts to classify Typha species have resulted in the adoption of a loosely defined and intuitive approach to taxonomy, based largely on field observations and incorporating the analysis of some micromorphological characters (Hotchkiss & Dozier, 1949;Finlayson & al., 1985). The delimitation of Typha species based on morphology alone is often not possible Zhang & al., 2008) due to the high degree of plasticity among the morphological characters. Therefore, a number of molecular markers (e.g., randomly amplified polymorphic DNA [RAPD], amplified fragment length polymorphism [AFLP], or sequence information of nuclear and ptDNA) have been used for Typha species delineation, at least as a supplemental tool Zhang & al., 2008;Na & al., 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delimitation of Typha species based on morphology alone is often not possible Zhang & al., 2008) due to the high degree of plasticity among the morphological characters. Therefore, a number of molecular markers (e.g., randomly amplified polymorphic DNA [RAPD], amplified fragment length polymorphism [AFLP], or sequence information of nuclear and ptDNA) have been used for Typha species delineation, at least as a supplemental tool Zhang & al., 2008;Na & al., 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular identification has been successfully used to solve the problems of species delimitation, genetic relationships, and the determination of hybrid origins in taxonomically difficult groups (Zhang et al 2008;Kim et al 2010aKim et al , 2012. A high level of genetic variation in the markers used is required for delimitating species and for determining the relationships among the species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%