2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1430744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular simulation of crystal growth in n-eicosane

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inDynamic structure of methane/n-nonane clusters during nucleation and growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
116
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
116
1
Order By: Relevance
“…34 This discrepancy cannot be due to the difference in temperature alone. We have traced this deviation in part to the overly large time step of 5 fs used in that work; such a large time step was reported by Waheed et al 37 to increase the chain relaxation time by only 10%, but its effect in suppressing nucleation is apparently more dramatic, compared to the more accurate rRESPA scheme used in this work. Our estimate for nucleation rate is also higher than the rate of 105 × 10 30 m −3 s −1 reported by Anwar et al at 250 K. 43 In this case, we suspect that the discrepancy is due to the application of the MFPT analysis method proposed by Wedekind et al 14 which employs the single-exponential approximation; as shown for our system in Table I, the singleexponential approximation results in an underestimation of the true nucleation rate.…”
Section: Case Study: N-eicosane Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 This discrepancy cannot be due to the difference in temperature alone. We have traced this deviation in part to the overly large time step of 5 fs used in that work; such a large time step was reported by Waheed et al 37 to increase the chain relaxation time by only 10%, but its effect in suppressing nucleation is apparently more dramatic, compared to the more accurate rRESPA scheme used in this work. Our estimate for nucleation rate is also higher than the rate of 105 × 10 30 m −3 s −1 reported by Anwar et al at 250 K. 43 In this case, we suspect that the discrepancy is due to the application of the MFPT analysis method proposed by Wedekind et al 14 which employs the single-exponential approximation; as shown for our system in Table I, the singleexponential approximation results in an underestimation of the true nucleation rate.…”
Section: Case Study: N-eicosane Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,35 The system consisted of 336 C20 molecules, with a united atom (UA) representation in which each UA represents a CH 3 or CH 2 group. The force field was initially proposed by Paul, Yoon, and Smith 36 with subsequent modifications by Waheed et al, 37,38 and includes bond stretching, bond angle bending, torsion, and non-bonded Lennard-Jones forces. We used a rRESPA integration scheme 39 with a time step of 2 fs for bonded interactions and 4 fs for intermolecular interactions.…”
Section: Case Study: N-eicosane Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used a united atom model for polyethylene in which the chains consist of monomers that represent CH 2 and CH 3 groups [41,55]. The system parameters were the same as in ref.…”
Section: Model and Order Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35][36][37][38] However, we shall not primarily examine the thermodynamic background of these rates here. Rather, we use a procedure analogous to the one described above to model different particle shapes and different growth dimensionalities.…”
Section: ͑7͒mentioning
confidence: 99%