2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular simulations of silicate melts doped with sulphur and nitrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study concluded that "reduced sulfur is associated with network modifiers and does not replace bridging oxygen in substantial amounts," and that "free S 2− is not relevant in silicate melts" (Wilke et al, 2011, p. 52 and p. 73). This is also supported by a molecular simulation study (Machacek et al, 2010). Based on a thorough spectroscopic study of hydrous glasses, Klimm et al (2012) demonstrated that both SH − and H2S are present in Fe-free silicate systems, whereas in the presence of iron both these forms are absent so that only Fe-S complexes exist in the melt.…”
Section: Proposed Mechanism Of S Dissolution In Silicate Meltsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This study concluded that "reduced sulfur is associated with network modifiers and does not replace bridging oxygen in substantial amounts," and that "free S 2− is not relevant in silicate melts" (Wilke et al, 2011, p. 52 and p. 73). This is also supported by a molecular simulation study (Machacek et al, 2010). Based on a thorough spectroscopic study of hydrous glasses, Klimm et al (2012) demonstrated that both SH − and H2S are present in Fe-free silicate systems, whereas in the presence of iron both these forms are absent so that only Fe-S complexes exist in the melt.…”
Section: Proposed Mechanism Of S Dissolution In Silicate Meltsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This width value has been chosen in the light of the SO4 2group dissolution mechanisms. Recent works suggest that SO4 2dissolves in the silicate melt structure either by scavenging non-bridging oxygen (Morizet et al 2013a(Morizet et al , 2015b or possibly in a similar way to CO3 2groups by forming free M n+ ..SO4 2clusters (Brooker et al 2001b;Machacek et al 2010;Morizet et al 2015b;Moussallam et al 2016) where M n+ is a charge balancing cation of different nature (e.g. Ca 2+ or Mg 2+ ).…”
Section: Spectrum Deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact the formation of the Si-O-S is strong enough to change the 29 Si NMR spectral signature so as to mimic a polymerization effect of SO 2 dissolution onto the melt structure. In other words, the shift of -3 ppm in the 29 Si peak maximum witnessing the apparent increase in melt polymerization only reflects the consumption of non-bridging oxygen by SO 2 molecules to form SO 4 2molecular groups (Manara et al, 2007;Machacek et al, 2010). Consequently, the dissolution of SO 2 molecules in silicate melts does not induce the formation of Si-O-Si bonds, which should be accompanied by an increase in glass transition temperature which is related to the kinetic rate of forming/breaking of Si-O-Si bonds (Liu et al, 1988;Moynihan, 1995).…”
Section: Implications For S Dissolution Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential slight decrease in Tg with increasing S evidenced by fit parameters of Eq. 2 is more difficult to explain as it implies that Si-O-Si molecular bonding are broken upon S dissolution which is unlikely (Machacek et al, 2010). If S dissolution does induce major changes on the silicate network structure, an alternative explanation is that the dissolution of S as SO 4 2induces slight geometrical changes (Si-O bond length and/or angle).…”
Section: Implications For S Dissolution Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%