1951
DOI: 10.1021/j150489a012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Structure and Deviations from the Bro***nsted Relation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other evidence is that inorganic bases such as phosphate (HP042") do not enhance NHC12 decay in the absence of HOC1 (28), suggesting OCT would not directly catalyze NHC12 decay. ÓCT, however, is a well-known a nucleophile (31)(32)(33), indicating that it may be near impossible to calculate ab initio the reactivity of OCT to the proton on NHC12.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other evidence is that inorganic bases such as phosphate (HP042") do not enhance NHC12 decay in the absence of HOC1 (28), suggesting OCT would not directly catalyze NHC12 decay. ÓCT, however, is a well-known a nucleophile (31)(32)(33), indicating that it may be near impossible to calculate ab initio the reactivity of OCT to the proton on NHC12.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By selecting one reaction series as a standard, e.g., A, equation 10 may be considered composed of two parts log (ki/kO)A 3 xi (11) dependent only on the change in the variable x, and gzBTA/gzATB = GzAB (12) dependent only on the nature of and the conditions employed for reaction series B and its susceptibility to changes in x relative to that for the standard reaction series A.…”
Section: (10)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 56 reaction series common to both treatments, Bekkum, Verkade and Wepster find 34% having correlation coefficients better than 0.998, 77% better than 0.99 and 89% better than 0.98; while Jaff6, for these reaction series, finds 29% better than 0.99, 59% better than 0.98, but none better than 0.998, in fact only 6% of the 371 reactions covered shorn this high precision. That this marked improvement is due to the removal of deviations due to variable p-substituent influences is shown by the computation of sigmavalues for other m-substituents (Table IV, numbers [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The standard deviations obtained are no larger than might be expected and do not greatly exceed those for substituents "H" and "p-NOn" (Table V) calculated from reaction series correlated using the primary values of these substituents.…”
Section: The Substituent Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations