2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02742015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular structure of dimethylthiocarbamoyl chloride according to gas phase electron diffraction data andAB INITIO calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
3
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the observed contraction in the r(C(X)-N) bond when comparing the amides (X ) O) 6,7 with the corresponding TFA and TCC thioamides (X ) S) were reproduced at the MP2/ 6-31+G(d,p) level of theory. Also, it was seen from Table 8 that there were some significant differences between the previously reported results for TCC 8 and the results in the present work. The r g (CdS) bond distance was found to be significantly higher in the previous work, 8 having a r g value of 1.652(5) Å compared to 1.641(3) Å observed for TCC in the present work.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the observed contraction in the r(C(X)-N) bond when comparing the amides (X ) O) 6,7 with the corresponding TFA and TCC thioamides (X ) S) were reproduced at the MP2/ 6-31+G(d,p) level of theory. Also, it was seen from Table 8 that there were some significant differences between the previously reported results for TCC 8 and the results in the present work. The r g (CdS) bond distance was found to be significantly higher in the previous work, 8 having a r g value of 1.652(5) Å compared to 1.641(3) Å observed for TCC in the present work.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…Also, it was seen from Table 8 that there were some significant differences between the previously reported results for TCC 8 and the results in the present work. The r g (CdS) bond distance was found to be significantly higher in the previous work, 8 having a r g value of 1.652(5) Å compared to 1.641(3) Å observed for TCC in the present work. The value from the MP4(SDQ) calculations was 1.649 Å, whereas it was 1.638 Å at the MP2 level, see Table 5.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations