2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.779168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Subtypes and Prognostic Signature of Pyroptosis-Related lncRNAs in Glioma Patients

Abstract: The relationship between pyroptosis-related long non-coding RNAs (pyroptosis-related lncRNAs) and glioma prognosis have not been studied clearly. Basing on The Cancer Genome Atlas and The Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas datasets, we firstly identified 23 pyroptosis-related lncRNAs with Pearson coefficient |r| > 0.5 and p < 0.001. The survival probability was lower in cluster 1. 13 lncRNAs was included into signature and divided all the glioma patients into two groups, among which survival probability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, Tanzhu et al also developed a pyroptosis-related lncRNA signature for glioma patients; the ROC curves were adopted for evaluating the output of their signature, in the TCGA cohort, the respective values of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.869, 0.886, and 0.899, respectively. It was similar to our results that are shown in Figure 2(h) , but the predictive capacity of model decreased in the CGGA cohort [ 25 ]; in our signature, it still showed outstanding performance for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS. The respective AUC areas of ROC analysis were 0.791, 0.856, and 0.868, while compared to the ROC results of another published pyroptosis-related lncRNAs model in GBM patients, our signature also showed analogously excellent power of prediction [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Meanwhile, Tanzhu et al also developed a pyroptosis-related lncRNA signature for glioma patients; the ROC curves were adopted for evaluating the output of their signature, in the TCGA cohort, the respective values of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.869, 0.886, and 0.899, respectively. It was similar to our results that are shown in Figure 2(h) , but the predictive capacity of model decreased in the CGGA cohort [ 25 ]; in our signature, it still showed outstanding performance for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS. The respective AUC areas of ROC analysis were 0.791, 0.856, and 0.868, while compared to the ROC results of another published pyroptosis-related lncRNAs model in GBM patients, our signature also showed analogously excellent power of prediction [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To construct accurate and stable prognostic models for glioma, many researchers have focused their attention on cell‐death‐related genes. Genes associated with ferroptosis, pyroptosis or autophagy have previously been included in the construction of glioma prognostic models, and these models showed good prediction power 22,34–36 . We reasonably speculated that cuproptosis, a recently defined form of cell death, is correlated with glioma prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Many studies have highlighted the power of lncRNA‐based computational models to predict glioma prognosis and tumour response to therapy. The pathways involved in these lncRNAs include immune, autophagy, ferroptosis and pyroptosis 19–22 . However, a prognosis predictive model based on cuproptosis‐related lncRNAs for glioma has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we selected some relevant literature to compare the predictive power of the prognostic models. Compared with other models, our prediction model has better predictive power ( Figure 7B ) ( 31 35 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%