“…Our data would suggest that a combinatorial blood-based biomarker approach 75 , using circulating markers derived from a gene panel such as ours, validated across distinct ALS patient populations (as in Figure 5d), would be a more appropriate way to identify subgroups that would benefit from targeted therapies. Promising candidates are based on the 20 genes from our NPS-defining gene list that strongly delineate clusters in an independent, publicly available dataset (i.e., GRIN2B, RALB, BCL2L2, PINK1, MAP2K1, TBR1, PAK1, ATP6V1A, NEFL, GRIA1, CAMK4, MEF2C, CD47, MAPK10, RAB6B, PRKACB, RB1CC1, HOF1A, GCLC ) and two additional NPS-defining genes ( CD44 and TYROBP ) that also appear in a recently identified gene list defining a molecular subgroup relating to glial activation 61 . Molecular stratification, in the form of tissue derived and circulating biomarkers, is the mainstay of patient stratification for clinical trials in oncology 76 ; given the convergence of these studies with our data, molecular subtyping should be considered for future trials implementing targeted therapies in people with ALS.…”