2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular systematics of Pampus (Perciformes: Stromateidae) based on thousands of nuclear loci using target-gene enrichment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Divya et al [21] described the Pampus species collected from the Arabian Sea as a new species, P. candidus, but we think further scrutiny should be made to split more species from P. cinereus lineages before distinct morphological characters are identified. On the other hand, P. liuorum, a controversial Pampus species, was defined as a synonym of P. cinereus in our previous study [15], but a recent study justified P. liuorum as a valid species using two mitochondrial DNA barcodes [66]. In their Cytb trees, P. cinereus and P. liuroum sampled in the western Pacific were separated in two lineages, which was different from our result, but their COI tree corroborated our result that P. cinereus and P. liuroum are not reciprocal in monophyletic.…”
Section: Intraspecific Diversification Of P Chinensis and P Cinereusmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Divya et al [21] described the Pampus species collected from the Arabian Sea as a new species, P. candidus, but we think further scrutiny should be made to split more species from P. cinereus lineages before distinct morphological characters are identified. On the other hand, P. liuorum, a controversial Pampus species, was defined as a synonym of P. cinereus in our previous study [15], but a recent study justified P. liuorum as a valid species using two mitochondrial DNA barcodes [66]. In their Cytb trees, P. cinereus and P. liuroum sampled in the western Pacific were separated in two lineages, which was different from our result, but their COI tree corroborated our result that P. cinereus and P. liuroum are not reciprocal in monophyletic.…”
Section: Intraspecific Diversification Of P Chinensis and P Cinereusmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…High value and perpetual demand make the genus one of the most sought after in commercial targeted fisheries in its native ranges, such as India (CMFRI, 2020), 1 countries bordering the seas of China, the maritime subregion of the Bay of Bengal ("BOB"), Persian Gulf countries, and Pakistan (Froese and Pauly, 2020). Despite this, the taxonomy of the genus Pampus has been uncertain and is still debated because of synapomorphies (Yin et al, 2019), and, conversely, the taxonomic literature hinted that many of the known species probably represented misidentified ones, leading to the occurrence of synonyms (Li et al, 2019c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latest global reports indicate the presence of the following seven valid species in the genus including the cryptic species described herein: Pampus argenteus, Pampus minor, Pampus punctatissimus, Pampus chinensis, Pampus cinereus, Pampus candidus, and Pampus sp. In 2017, Jawad and Jig, based on detailed comparative osteology of the axial skeleton, identified eight valid species in this genus, such as Pampus liuorum (Liu and Li, 2013) and Pampus nozawae (Ishikawa, 1904), which were found to be invalid by previous and subsequent researchers who considered them as synonyms of P. cinereus (Liu et al, 2013a;Li et al, 2019c;Yin et al, 2019). The existence of a strong geographic genetic structure in P. argenteus from the Indo-Western Pacific area was indicated (Sun et al, 2013), and a COI-based analysis of Pampus specimens by Divya et al (2017) revealed the presence of seven distinct but taxonomically indecisive clades with two putative species viz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because exon markers tend to be more variable across the target region than UCEs or the markers used for AHE, two rounds of in vitro hybridization are optimal for their sequence capture protocols (Li et al., 2013). This improvement in laboratory techniques has resulted in a number of studies that implement exon capture for fish phylogenomics (Arcila et al., 2017; Betancur‐R et al., 2019; Ilves & López‐Fernández, 2014; Ilves et al., 2017; Kuang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2015; Rincon‐Sandoval et al., 2019; Song et al., 2017; Straube et al., 2018; Yin et al., 2019). The increase in genomic resources for fishes also has allowed for the comparison of a larger number of genomes for probe design (Li et al., 2012), and ultimately eight ray‐finned fish genomes have been used to identify > 17,000 “single‐copy” exons (Song et al., 2017) using a modification of the reciprocal BLAST approach of Li et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%