2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-0634-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular trade-offs in soil organic carbon composition at continental scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
71
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we agree with Hall et al. (2020) that climate classification holds the potential to reunite diverging explanations for SOC persistence to complementarity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we agree with Hall et al. (2020) that climate classification holds the potential to reunite diverging explanations for SOC persistence to complementarity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…At the same time, Hall et al. (2020) provided climate‐related predictors that explain ninety percent of the SOC composition variance. Hence, even at the molecular scale, SOC variability is determined by larger‐scaled environmental variables.…”
Section: The Old Tool and The New Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, changes in soil C components under warming conditions across soils with different organic matter contents remain unknown, limiting our ability to predict the response of soils to climate change. Some studies have shown that the chemical complexity and changes in the molecular structure of SOC can determine the rates of microbial decomposition and C turnover under increasing temperatures 4 , 5 . For example, plant-derived polymers, such as lignin, have complex chemical structures that cannot easily decompose within a short time 6 , 7 , whereas low-molecular-weight compounds, such as proteins, carbohydrates, and fats, are more susceptible to the adverse effects of a warming climate 8 , because lower-molecular-weight C is less expensive to metabolize 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from tundra, boreal and tropical forests also had relatively lower microbial necromass contributions to SOC compared with other ecosystems (Table 1). Relatively higher lignin versus protein in forest ecosystem organic matter inputs 13 or a low rhizosphere-to-bulk soil ratio in forests compared with other ecosystems could decrease SOC accumulation due to relatively low C transformation rates and efficiency 14 .…”
Section: Global Distribution Of Microbial Necromassmentioning
confidence: 99%