2018
DOI: 10.1177/0040517517753642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular weight and organization of cellulose at different stages of cotton fiber development

Abstract: There is a continuous change in cell wall composition and organization during cotton fiber development. Cotton fiber strength correlates to the molecular weight (MW) and molecular weight distribution (MWD), and organization of cellulose chains in the secondary cell wall. These parameters change drastically during fiber development. This study reports on the MW, MWD, and organization of cellulose in cotton fibers harvested from two cotton cultivars of Gossypium hirsutum L., (Texas Marker-1 and TX55) at differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vibrant color contrast generated along the fiber represents the birefringence that was caused by the crystalline arrays of cellulose microfibrils in the secondary cell wall [ 23 ]. Thus, fibers with a well-organized secondary cell wall appeared brighter and show greater birefringence [ 24 ]. Less mature fibers appeared in blue color, whereas more mature fibers appeared in yellow color that represents a birefringence generated from organized crystalline cellulose [ 25 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vibrant color contrast generated along the fiber represents the birefringence that was caused by the crystalline arrays of cellulose microfibrils in the secondary cell wall [ 23 ]. Thus, fibers with a well-organized secondary cell wall appeared brighter and show greater birefringence [ 24 ]. Less mature fibers appeared in blue color, whereas more mature fibers appeared in yellow color that represents a birefringence generated from organized crystalline cellulose [ 25 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a Before transferring the solution to an oven at 105°C and after b 6 h, c 9 h, and d 12 h at 105°C peak intensities at 1640 cm -1 and 897 cm -1 , which were attributed to O-H bending of adsorbed water and b-linkage of cellulose, respectively. This is because dissolution followed by regeneration increases the amorphous region of cellulose, which in turn facilitates water adsorption and accessibility of b-linkage by the IR beam (Ciolacu et al 2011;Liyanage and Abidi 2019). Similar changes in the IR band at 897 cm -1 have been reported due to the regeneration of native cellulose (Ciolacu et al 2011;Dissanayake et al 2019).…”
Section: Ftir Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The peak intensity ratio of 1429/897 cm -1 was termed the IR lateral order index (Hurtubise and Krassig 1960). It serves as empirical crystallinity index of cellulose (Abidi et al 2014) and is positively correlated to the change in cellulose crystallinity (Liyanage and Abidi 2019). Due to dissolution and regeneration, the intensity of the vibration at 1429 cm -1 decreased, and the intensity of the vibration at 897 cm -1 increased.…”
Section: Ftir Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, frequently, conditions are optimized for effective dissolution of cellulose obtained from various sources. For example, cotton cellulose that possesses a high DP of 8000–15,000 and CrI of ~80% is recalcitrant to dissolution under mild conditions, although these characteristics are cultivar-dependent [ 26 , 27 ]. The dissolution process is affected by several factors such as cellulose drying conditions (oven drying vs. freeze drying), various pretreatments, cellulose concentration, dissolution temperature, pH, and moisture content [ 12 , 16 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon dissolution, viscous cellulose solutions can be converted into different material architectures using dry- or wet- jet spinning [ 29 , 30 , 31 ], electrospinning [ 32 , 33 , 34 ], or casting, followed by gelation, regeneration in protic solvents, such as water and alcohols, and drying ( via air-drying, hot pressing, supercritical CO 2 drying, etc.) [ 2 , 17 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Each of these techniques results in cellulose recovery in a form of amorphous bioproducts (e.g., hydrogels, films/membranes, aerogels, and beads [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%