donor:acceptor ratio, molecular weight, and processing parameters (annealing/ coating temperature, choices of co-solvent or solvent additive, solvent annealing, etc.) come into play in determining the final morphology of a PSC and thus key performance parameters, such as open-circuit voltage (V oc ), short-circuit current density (J sc ), and fill factor (FF). For a new photovoltaic polymer or a new donor:acceptor combination, new solvents and other processing conditions are usually empirically explored and optimized within a limited range of variables. Furthermore, there is currently no widely recognized conceptual framework that allows determining the best-matched acceptor material for a given donor polymer and only by carefully considering the influences of each parameter individually can these factors be exploited. All of these variables make it extremely challenging to predict the optimal BHJ morphology and performance of PSCs when designing and using new materials. [2,7,8,[11][12][13][14] In the BHJ of a PSC device, the polymeric electron donor (D) and organic electron acceptor (A) materials form a complex structure and morphology with the goal of optimizing simultaneously photon absorption, exciton separation, and charge transport. Generally, the disorder and semi-crystalline (sometimes nearly amorphous) qualities of the organic/polymeric photovoltaic materials make their blends difficult to form a simple two-phase morphology with pure aggregated donor and acceptor phases. [15] A three-phase morphology (see Figure 1a) including pure donor aggregates, pure acceptor aggregates, and amorphous intermixed portions (consisting of dispersed fullerene in the mostly amorphous polymer) has been previously observed or inferred by us and others in a wide range of PSC material systems. [16][17][18][19][20] Recent kinetic Monte Carlo simulations [21] have suggested that this three-phase morphology may be favorable as the electronic structure of both the donor and acceptor depends on the level of aggregation, thus providing an electronic landscape that can help to sweep out charges created in the mixed phases. Molecular dynamics simulations of a matrix of polymer:acene blends pointed to the significance of thermodynamic molecular interactions in determining the formation of BHJ morphologies. [14] Practically, these molecular interactions determine an upper limit of purity of the mixed phases in the blend films, [22] which will likely impact charge creation and recombination processes in devices. [13,17,23,24] Polymer solar cells (PSCs) continue to be a promising low-cost and lead-free photovoltaic technology. Of critical importance to PSCs is understanding and manipulating the composition of the amorphous mixed phase, which is governed by the thermodynamic molecular interactions of the polymer donor and acceptor molecules and the kinetics of the casting process. This progress report clarifies and defines nomenclature relating to miscibility and its relevance and implications to PSC devices in light of new developments. U...