2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.07.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecularly imprinted polymers as a tool for the study of the 4-ethylphenol metabolic pathway in red wines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wine is a complex matrix formed by a mixture of volatile and non‐volatile compounds, most of which are present at low concentration; as a result, extraction and/or preconcentration steps are always required prior to the chromatographic quantification. Several extractive techniques have been applied to the extraction of phenols from red wines, from the old and widely used liquid–liquid extraction (LLE), usually requiring several laborious extraction steps and the use of large volumes of toxic organic solvents (Moio and Etievant ), to the more recent techniques, aiming at the reduction or even elimination of hazardous solvents, such as solid‐phase extraction (SPE) using conventional sorbents (Allen et al ) or molecular‐imprinted polymers (Garcia et al ), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) (Diez et al ), single drop microextraction (SDME) (Jain et al ), direct immersion solid‐phase microextraction (DI‐SPME) (Barnaba et al ), headspace solid‐phase microextraction (HS‐SPME) (Monje et al , Carrillo and Tena ), quick easy cheap effective rugged safe (QuEChERS) (Valente et al ) and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) (Fariña et al , Pizarro et al , Carpinteiro et al ). Overall, microextraction techniques present limits of quantification and of detection lower than SPE and LLE with the benefit of requiring a lower sample volume and being easy to perform and to automate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wine is a complex matrix formed by a mixture of volatile and non‐volatile compounds, most of which are present at low concentration; as a result, extraction and/or preconcentration steps are always required prior to the chromatographic quantification. Several extractive techniques have been applied to the extraction of phenols from red wines, from the old and widely used liquid–liquid extraction (LLE), usually requiring several laborious extraction steps and the use of large volumes of toxic organic solvents (Moio and Etievant ), to the more recent techniques, aiming at the reduction or even elimination of hazardous solvents, such as solid‐phase extraction (SPE) using conventional sorbents (Allen et al ) or molecular‐imprinted polymers (Garcia et al ), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) (Diez et al ), single drop microextraction (SDME) (Jain et al ), direct immersion solid‐phase microextraction (DI‐SPME) (Barnaba et al ), headspace solid‐phase microextraction (HS‐SPME) (Monje et al , Carrillo and Tena ), quick easy cheap effective rugged safe (QuEChERS) (Valente et al ) and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) (Fariña et al , Pizarro et al , Carpinteiro et al ). Overall, microextraction techniques present limits of quantification and of detection lower than SPE and LLE with the benefit of requiring a lower sample volume and being easy to perform and to automate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all MIP adsorbents for food samples were synthesized via non‐covalent imprinting techniques. Moreover, the bulk polymerization is one of the frequently used polymerization methods for preparing MIP particles [23,25,28,83–87]. Garcia et al.…”
Section: Applications Of Molecularly Imprinted Polymer‐based Spe To Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar magnitude of volatile phenol removal was noted when yeast lees (in the form of active dried yeast) was added to model wine containing 4-EP and 4-EG (Chassagne et al 2005), and there appears a scope to optimise the capacity of yeast biomass to perform this function (Pradelles et al 2009). Two recent studies describe MIPs developed against ethylphenols (Garcia et al 2015, Teixeira et al 2015, however, initial results indicate poor specificity when attempting to remove these compounds from spoiled wine. Nonetheless, when combined with physical treatments such as reverse osmosis it may be possible to reduce this impact (Ugarte et al 2005).…”
Section: Removal Of Ethylphenols Post-spoilage Of Winementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, more specific adsorbents such as molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) could be developed for removal of Brett compounds. Two recent studies describe MIPs developed against ethylphenols (Garcia et al 2015, Teixeira et al 2015, however, initial results indicate poor specificity when attempting to remove these compounds from spoiled wine. A preliminary study recently published inferred that some remediation is even possible post-bottling; suberin in cork closures was shown to have significant ethylphenolbinding capacity (Gallardo-Chacón and Karbowiak 2015).…”
Section: Removal Of Ethylphenols Post-spoilage Of Winementioning
confidence: 99%