“…By contrast, the use of the catecholic primers P 3 ( σ shear, max = 0.8 ± 0.2 and 4.2 ± 0.7 MPa, n = 10), P 4 ( σ shear, max = 0.9 ± 0.1 and 4.5 ± 0.5 MPa, n = 10) doubled the lap shear strength compared with the no-primer case. In fact, the measured strengths of the catechol-primed samples were equal, within experimental uncertainty, to that of the silane-primed surface ( σ shear, max = 0.9 ± 0.4 and 3.8 ± 1.1 MPa, n = 10), which is used as the industry standard despite of its low surface coverage, high energy consumption and toxic chemical usage [1,2] (Figure 3d,e; Figure S9, Supporting Information). On tooth enamel (Figure 3f), the lap shear strength measured using surfaces primed with P 3 ( σ shear, max = 3.0 ± 0.3 MPa, n = 10), and P 4 ( σ shear, max = 3.0 ± 0.3 MPa, n = 10) was almost double that of the no-primer case ( σ shear, max = 1.8 ± 0.1 MPa, n = 10), and equal, within experimental uncertainty, to that of MDP ( σ shear, max = 3.1 ± 0.2 MPa, n = 10), which is used as the dental industry standard despite the unfavorable pH dependency of phosphate-calcium binding.…”