2014 IEEE 34th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icdcs.2014.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MOLStream: A Modular Rapid Development and Evaluation Framework for Live P2P Streaming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within a single network node, modules may interact with one another through method invocation having a fixed interface. Different implementations of modules can also be mixed and matched, similarly to our earlier work in this area [28].…”
Section: A Ingredients Of P2p Live Streamingmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within a single network node, modules may interact with one another through method invocation having a fixed interface. Different implementations of modules can also be mixed and matched, similarly to our earlier work in this area [28].…”
Section: A Ingredients Of P2p Live Streamingmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Our ingredient abstraction is inspired by these works, while cast in the P2P live streaming environment. MOL-STREAM is our previous system primarily designed for the rapid deployment and evaluating of P2P live streaming protocols, which also sought to modularize these protocols [28]. While we leverage the system for deployment, the built-in MOLSTREAM modules are coarse-grained and mostly lack intercompatibility, whereas the finer-grained ingredients we proposed in STREAMAID are more atomic, intercompatible and shed light on the design decisions involved.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…SEINE is also related to a significant body of work in the area of languages and tools for building and testing dependable distributed systems. In particular, practical frameworks such as Mace [16], Splay [19], and MOLStream [9] provide language support that enables developers to work on the different concerns that comprise a distributed system in isolation, thereby simplifying the overall process. Although performance and dependability concerns are also taken into account by these frameworks (e.g., fault handling support, performance and correctness analysis), there is no explicit guidance for addressing selfishness-related issues.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%