“…Indeed, all the analyzed magmas outline a relatively narrow δ 98/95 Mo range, with values between 0.10‰ and 0.26‰ for Vesuvius and 0.07‰ and 0.24‰ for Tuscan magmas, covering a total range of Δ 98/95 Mo of 0.18‰ (Table 1). The studied magmas have considerably higher δ 98/95 Mo than MORBs (Bezard et al, 2016;Freymuth et al, 2015;Liang et al, 2017) and are among the heaviest Mo isotope compositions recorded so far in subduction-related magmas (e.g., Aegean arc, Cyprus, Marianas, Solomon Islands, and Papua New Guinea; Freymuth et al, 2015;König et al, 2016;Voegelin et al, 2014;Figure 4c Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems case, the trace element, radiogenic isotope, and Mo isotope compositions have been advocated to support the predominant role of recycled sedimentary material into their magma source with no Mo isotope fractionation Gaschnig et al, 2017). In contrast, in the second two cases the Mo isotope variation from isotopically light to heavy values has been interpreted as due to isotopic fractionation during (Freymuth et al, 2015Gaschnig et al, 2017;König et al, 2016;Voegelin et al, 2014;Wille et al, 2018) and MORB average (Gale et al, 2013).…”