2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molybdenum, Mo–Ir and Mo–Ru coatings as permanent chemical modifiers for the determination of cadmium and lead in sediments and soil samples by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally known that chemical modifiers stabilize the analyte and effectively contribute to the removal of the sample matrix in the ETAAS analysis procedure, which reduces the background contribution and minimizes chemical interferences. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]23 Thereafter, a chemical modifier mixture was always injected simultaneously with the sample solution (20 µL sample/blank solution plus 5 µL chemical modifier solution). Figure 3 shows the influence of the presence of the chemical modifier (8.0 µg/L Pd/10.0 µg Mg[NO 3 ] 2 in 5 µL solution) on the As analyte absorbance (Fig.…”
Section: Ashing and Atomization Temperature Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is generally known that chemical modifiers stabilize the analyte and effectively contribute to the removal of the sample matrix in the ETAAS analysis procedure, which reduces the background contribution and minimizes chemical interferences. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]23 Thereafter, a chemical modifier mixture was always injected simultaneously with the sample solution (20 µL sample/blank solution plus 5 µL chemical modifier solution). Figure 3 shows the influence of the presence of the chemical modifier (8.0 µg/L Pd/10.0 µg Mg[NO 3 ] 2 in 5 µL solution) on the As analyte absorbance (Fig.…”
Section: Ashing and Atomization Temperature Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Furthermore, elements that form carbides such as molybdenum, hafnium, niobium, tungsten, tantalum, and zirconium, as well as NH 4 HPO 4 -Mg(NO 3 ) 2 , nitric acid, and silver nanoparticles have also been suggested. 21,23,24 How exactly the chemical modifier works is a matter of debate. Regarding Pd as a chemical modifier, it has been proposed that it either forms a nonvolatile intermetallic compound or a solid solution with Pd 25 or it could somehow be connected with a reaction that includes graphite material and the analyte.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical grade reagents of HNO3 (65%, w/w, Chem-Lab NV), HCl (37%, w/w -Sigma Aldrich) and Triton X-100 (99.95%, w/w-Merck) were used without further purifications. The autosampler washing solution containing HNO3 0.2% (v/v) and Triton X-100 0.1% (v/v) was used to avoid clogging of the autosampler capillary tip, to prevent analyte adsorption of on the surface of the autosampler cups and to modify physical properties of the solution in order to improve the dispersion of sample onto the platform [5,[10][11][12].…”
Section: Materials Reagents and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This outcome effect is must desired in the analysis of volatile semimetals (As, Se, Te etc). Noble metals with high melting point (Pd, Pt, Ir, Rh and Ru) [2][3][4] and elements that can form carbides (Mo, Hf, Nb, W, Ta, Zr) [5] are the most employed as mono or multi-component matrix modifiers in ETAAS technique. The most used is paladium which can be combined with magnesium nitrate or organic compounds [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it has been necessary for analytical chemists to evaluate the environmental and healthy quantities based on accurate determination of Cd 2+ and Pb 2+ both in environmental and biological samples. For this purpose, the analytical methods including electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], graphite furnace AAS [14][15][16], electroanalytical methods [17,18], inductively coupled plasmaatomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) [19] and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [20,21] are generally used. Most of these methods have disadvantages as far as cost and instruments used in routine analysis are concerned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%