1980
DOI: 10.1021/j100447a002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moment theory analysis of eROH- optical absorption spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table we have listed values of 〈α(0)〉, 〈 r 2 〉, and 〈 T 〉 for solvated electrons in H 2 O and in D 2 O at different temperatures, , in THF, and in THF/H 2 O(D 2 O) mixtures. The quantities with the superscript exp are obtained directly from the experimental spectra in the restricted experimental spectral range, whereas the quantities marked by corr are obtained from the experimental spectra which were fitted and extended by a Gaussian and Lorentzian shape function beyond the experimentally observed spectral range (in order to approach the required integration limits 0 and ∞).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table we have listed values of 〈α(0)〉, 〈 r 2 〉, and 〈 T 〉 for solvated electrons in H 2 O and in D 2 O at different temperatures, , in THF, and in THF/H 2 O(D 2 O) mixtures. The quantities with the superscript exp are obtained directly from the experimental spectra in the restricted experimental spectral range, whereas the quantities marked by corr are obtained from the experimental spectra which were fitted and extended by a Gaussian and Lorentzian shape function beyond the experimentally observed spectral range (in order to approach the required integration limits 0 and ∞).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question about homogeneous vs inhomogeneous broadening in the optical absorption spectrum of the excess electron in water and other fluids, as well as the explanation of its asymmetry and extraordinary spectral width, has remained a standing problem for over three decades. Numerous attempts have been made to fit the experimental data by various line shapes and superposition of lines. In the computer simulations, by imposing an ordering of the p -states according to their energy, the resulting absorption contour was decomposed into a superposition of the contributions from separate s − p transitions. Each of the obtained three bands is claimed to be substantially inhomogeneously broadened by different structures of the solvent surroundings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulas ͑given in atomic units͒ are derived from dispersion relationships ͑Kramers-Kronig relations, f-sum rules͒ or by analogy to atomic systems using a one-electron representation. [11][12][13][14] Although the sum rules are rigorous, application of these formulas to solvated electrons depend upon two unproven assumptions. 15 First, the coupling of the electron to other electronic degrees of freedom must be sufficiently weak so that oscillator strength is not significantly transferred to or from the solvent spectrum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%