2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Momentary versus retrospective reports of alcohol or cannabis use, sexual activity, and their co-occurrence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were classified dichotomously as having engaged or not engaged in each tactic of sexual aggression based on whether they endorsed one or more items consistent with that type of sexual aggression. Determining the frequency of sexual aggression retrospectively does usually not provide useful information due to social desirability and memory biases, especially in the area of sexuality (see e.g., Willis et al., 2021 ). Furthermore, as the distribution of these items is usually highly skewed (with only a minority admitting having engaged in sexual aggression), assessing sexual aggression dichotomously is typical for the field to measure aggressive behavior (see e.g., Postrefusal Sexual Persistence scale [PSP], Struckman‐Johnson et al., 2003 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were classified dichotomously as having engaged or not engaged in each tactic of sexual aggression based on whether they endorsed one or more items consistent with that type of sexual aggression. Determining the frequency of sexual aggression retrospectively does usually not provide useful information due to social desirability and memory biases, especially in the area of sexuality (see e.g., Willis et al., 2021 ). Furthermore, as the distribution of these items is usually highly skewed (with only a minority admitting having engaged in sexual aggression), assessing sexual aggression dichotomously is typical for the field to measure aggressive behavior (see e.g., Postrefusal Sexual Persistence scale [PSP], Struckman‐Johnson et al., 2003 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La diferencia entre estas dos definiciones recae en que exponen el tipo de comunicación como un elemento de importancia dentro del constructo (Hickman & Muehlenhard,1999), mientras que Willis y Jozkowski (2019) se enfocan en el componente interno del deseo de participar y la capacidad de hacerlo partiendo del estado de sobriedad. El consentimiento sexual puede ser afectado por los estereotipos de género (Jozkowski et al, 2017), por el estado de relación (Willis & Jozkowski, 2019), y por el uso de alcohol y cannabis (Jozkowski & Wiersma, 2015;Willis et al, 2021).…”
unclassified
“…Recientemente, se estudió el uso del alcohol y otras sustancias en su influencia en el consentimiento sexual. En el estudio realizado por Willis et al (2021) se encontró que el alcohol y cannabis en sí solos no son un predictor de consentimiento sexual interno. Sin embargo, el uso de estas dos sustancias juntas disminuye sentimientos de seguridad y comodidad, y la sensación de que la interacción sexual fue consentida.…”
unclassified