1988
DOI: 10.1016/0047-259x(88)90097-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moments of distributions attracted to operator-stable laws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following result generalizes Theorem 3 of [21] which considers attraction to operator-stable laws, i.e. (4.11) holds for k n = n. In fact, the Corollary to Theorem 3 on page 8 of [21] for stochastically compact sequences might enable us to conclude uniform integrability.…”
Section: By (42) We Have Convergence Of the Riemann Sumsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following result generalizes Theorem 3 of [21] which considers attraction to operator-stable laws, i.e. (4.11) holds for k n = n. In fact, the Corollary to Theorem 3 on page 8 of [21] for stochastically compact sequences might enable us to conclude uniform integrability.…”
Section: By (42) We Have Convergence Of the Riemann Sumsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The following result generalizes Theorem 3 of [21] which considers attraction to operator-stable laws, i.e. (4.11) holds for k n = n. In fact, the Corollary to Theorem 3 on page 8 of [21] for stochastically compact sequences might enable us to conclude uniform integrability. But following the proof of Theorem 3 on the basis of the proof of Theorem 6.1 in [14] the exact knowledge of the weak accumulation points (4.14) enables us to sharpen the result.…”
Section: By (42) We Have Convergence Of the Riemann Sumsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Before proving the Theorem, we remark that these existence and convergence results extend Theorem 3 in Hudson, Veeh, and Weiner (1987) from absolute moments (in the general domain of attraction)…”
Section: Results and Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this 7Î choose TV so large that n > TV implies To prove the Theorem, we modify an argument of de Acosta (1979 and; as compared to the argument in Hudson, Veeh, and Weiner (1987), the work here is simplified because "regular variation" of the operators {n~A} for normal attraction is built in; no convergence-of-types arguments are required to see, for example, that for every m, we have (mn)~AnA -* m~A as n -+ oo.…”
Section: Results and Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%